search for: branch1

Dear Mr Petr Pikal I am extremely sorry for the manner I have raised the query. Actually that was my first post to this R forum and in fact even I was also bit confused while drafting the query, for which I really owe sorry to all for consuming the precious time. Perhaps I will try to redraft my query in a better way as follows. I have two datasets "A" and "B" containing the

...separate migrations by table or feature. Doing so should alleviate many of the problems that seem to pike up when working on teams and using migrations for everything. For example, if your db directory looked this: db/ migrate/ 001_create_things.rb 002_create_pandas.rb branch1/ 001_create_comments.rb 002_create_replies.rb branch2/ 001_create_posts.rb Then running rake db:migrate would look like this: ************************************************** -- Executing migrations in root... ***********************************************...

...*97,3,VoicemailMain(${CALLERIDNUM}@default) Is it possible to add some logic to manipulate the CALLERIDNUM to send back 801 even if the extension is 601 and 901 even if the extension is 701? I have 2 branch offices where users have both Office and Home SIP phones. I want them to share a VM box. Branch1 = 8XX , Home = 7XX Branch2 = 9XX, Home = 6XX Therefore I would like to manipulate the home CALLERIDNUM in both examples. Make sense? Thanks in advance.

Hi, all: My folders are organized in such a way: root ----branch1 ---------------A -----------------------file1.txt -----------------------file2.txt ---------------B -----------------------file1.txt -----------------------file2.txt ----branch2 ---------------A -----------------------file1.txt -----------------------file2.txt ---------------B --------------------...

hi all, I want to move some routing tasks out of the router and into the controller. The goal is to make Merb feel less like mod_rewrite and give the user more control at the controller. The new Router is simple: it takes the path_info (not the whole request) then outputs a controller class and some parameters from the path matching. The rest of the routing would be done at the controller level.

All, With the pending reorganization of the software, I have some questions about how developers set their PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH variables when working with LLVM. This is a bit long winded, but bear with me. We're planning to break the "llvm" module up into three modules: * support - lib/Support, lib/System, autoconf, make support, utilities * core - VMCore,