Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "baseop".
Did you mean:
baseos
2020 Feb 19
2
Poor write performance with golang binding
...tdout)
is reasonably fast with both language implementaitions (doing around
70 MiB/s).
Why is this, how the Go binding could be improved?
Regards,
Csaba
<code lang="ruby">
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
require 'optparse'
require 'ostruct'
require 'guestfs'
module BaseOp
extend self
def included mod
mod.module_eval { extend self }
end
def perform gu, opts, gudev
end
attr_reader :readonly
end
module OPS
extend self
def find name
m = self.constants.find { |c| c.to_s.downcase == name }
m ? const_get(m) : nil
end
def names
constant...
2020 Feb 19
0
Re: Poor write performance with golang binding
...ke sure that
the operations being done are the same for both languages?
Rich.
> Regards,
> Csaba
>
>
> <code lang="ruby">
> #!/usr/bin/env ruby
>
> require 'optparse'
> require 'ostruct'
> require 'guestfs'
>
> module BaseOp
> extend self
>
> def included mod
> mod.module_eval { extend self }
> end
>
> def perform gu, opts, gudev
> end
>
> attr_reader :readonly
> end
>
> module OPS
> extend self
>
> def find name
> m = self.constants.find { |c|...
2008 Dec 09
1
[LLVMdev] [PATH] Add sub.ovf/mul.ovf intrinsics
Hi,
The attached patch implements sub.ovf/mul.ovf intrinsics similarly to
the recently added add.ovf intrinsics. These are useful for
implementing some vm instructions like sub.ovf/mul.ovf in .NET IL
efficiently. sub.ovf is supported in target independent lowering and
on x86, while mul.ovf is only supported in the x86 backend.
Please review