Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "atomaticly".
Did you mean:
automaticly
2006 Aug 03
3
RE: [Patch][RFC] Support "xm dump" (is Re: Re: [Patch]Enable "sysrq c" handler for domU coredump)
Two things:
1. I''m not convinced ''xm crash'' is needed - ''xm destroy'' will do this
(and if you want
a dump, do ''xm dump'' followed by ''xm destroy'')
2. I don''t see the point of the --noreboot option on ''xm dump'' -- I
think this command
should simply live-dump the specified domain - as
2006 Aug 03
2
RE: [Patch][RFC] Support "xm dump" (is Re: Re:[Patch]Enable "sysrq c" handler for domU coredump)
> Hi, Simon
>
> >Two things:
> >
> >1. I''m not convinced ''xm crash'' is needed - ''xm destroy'' will do this
> >(and if you want
> > a dump, do ''xm dump'' followed by ''xm destroy'')
> >
> What do you mean?
> I think we cannot dump with "xm destroy" now.
>
2005 Apr 27
4
CentOS 4 Software Raid1 questions
...to know if the existing data on the orignal 40GB drive in
the system will be destroyed when I create the raid with
mdadm. Also do the 2 drives after being setup with mdadm
have to be reformated? Both the 40GB drives are now
formated with ext3. If not, will the added 40GB drive
assigned to the Raid1 atomaticly sync to the original 40GB
drive. If so, what do I need to do to assure this will
happend automaticly? Your comments are appreciated, as this
is my first time to setup a software Raid1.
Lee
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the be...
2006 Aug 01
18
[Patch] Enable "sysrq c" handler for domU coredump
Hi,
In the case of linux, crash_kexec() is occured by "sysrq c".
In the case of DomainU on xen, Help is occured by "sysrq c" now.
So The way of dumping DomainU''s memory manualy is nothing.
I fix this issue by the following way.
1. Panic is occured by "sysrq c" on both Domain0 and DomainU.
2. On DomainU, coredump is generated in /var/xen/dump (on Domain0).