search for: askey

Hello all, I got this problem while trying to shape traffic with iptables MARK and HTB. MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4 --set-mark gives "invalid argument" error message. Kernel version is 2.4.29 (some patches from patch o matic applied) Iptables version 1.3.4 Intel x86 architecture. I saw this problem discussed in a few places, but the discussions didn''t come to a conclusion

Hi all, I have VOIP network built with MGCP endpoints.The manufacturer of endpoints is ASKEY. I downloaded latest Asterisk software and found it very useful for me. I configured it and it seems taht everything works OK when I am testing it with one or two endpoints. After that I tried to move Asterisk to working network and replace existing call manager. It starts working and calls are pro...

.... 3 * D-33100 Paderborn * Germany Phone: +49 (0) 52 51-150 600 * Fax: +49 (0) 52 51-150 700 ******* http://www.zuken.com * mailto:Enno.Ostendorf at zuken.de ******* Enno Ostendorf * http://www.supersmart.de * mailto:no at supersmart.de Download PGP public key: http://www.supersmart.de/nopgp.askey

Hi, After spending some time trying to get a DG-104S working behind NAT, I finally found the problem. I made the incorrect assumption that nat=yes in mgcp.conf works just like sip.conf. The channels within a gateway are treated more closely to zap channels than sip channels (from a .conf standpoint). What this means is that you have to put nat=yes BEFORE any subchannel definitions: This

Hi, For MGCP users. Is there any success stories with any MGCP IAD vendor. I?m trying to find an IAD which works with Asterisk. I?ve tried the Cisco IAD 2430 without success; but SIP on this IAD works but it?s limited (no authentication, no notify messages, etc) and with higher density IAD (16 or more ports) it?s nice to control using MGCP. Any information will be apreciated ! Thanks. --

I saw this snippet from Daniel Chemko dchemko@smgtec.com Mon, 31 May 2004 09:30:43 -0700 # Egress marking (mostly for QOS operations) iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -j CONNMARK --restore-mark iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m mark ! --mark 0 -j ACCEPT iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o ${if_inet} --dport 21 -j MARK --set-mark 0x111 iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -j CONNMARK

...ed source code changes Apr 7 10:34:24 dev kernel: HiSax: Card 1 Protocol NI1 Id=hisax (0) Apr 7 10:34:24 dev kernel: HiSax: HFC-PCI driver Rev. 1.1.4.1 Apr 7 10:34:24 dev kernel: PCI: Enabling device 00:0a.0 (0000 -> 0003) Apr 7 10:34:24 dev kernel: HiSax: HFC-PCI card manufacturer: Asuscom/Askey card name: 675 Apr 7 10:34:24 dev kernel: HFC-PCI: defined at mem 0xe0a20000 fifo 0xd6178000(0x16178000) IRQ 11 HZ 100 Apr 7 10:34:24 dev kernel: HFC_PCI: resetting card Apr 7 10:34:24 dev kernel: HFC 2BDS0 PCI: IRQ 11 count 226490 Apr 7 10:34:25 dev kernel: HFC 2BDS0 PCI: IRQ 11 count 226524...

Hi All, I am adding ip_queue module for snort inline IDS. I am using snort2.4.0 And iptables-1.3.4. Userspace Queuing(queue target) is enabled. It is built-in and not built as a module. The output of /proc/net/ip_queue is shown below: cat /proc/net/ip_queue> Peer PID : 0 Copy mode : 0 Copy range : 0 Queue length : 0 Queue max. length : 1024 IPTABLES 1.3.4 is

----- Original Message ----- From: Karl Heyes <karl@pts.tele2.co.uk> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 5:29 PM Subject: Re: [icecast] Re: Compiling ices <p>> On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 06:39, Marc Remijn wrote: > ... > > > Kernel output: > > > > invalid operand: 0000 > > CPU: 0 > > EIP: 0010:[<d08e25b1>]

Hi All, I am facing a problem when using ULOG daemon and SNORT (inline mode) with iptables. My set up is like this. 1. I need ULOG daemon to log firewall logs to MYSQL database. 2. I need SNORT in inline mode for intrusion prevention. Both can work fine induvidually with iptables. But ULOG daemon cannot work when SNORT is also running. Probably the reason is that snort also hooks to

Hello all, I have browsed archives and real all available HOWTOs, but I still have a few doubts. My set up is a router, as below. LAN(100MB)-------------(eth1)Linux-Router(eth0)---------------WAN(2MB/512) My aim is to cotrol both uplink and downlink bandwidth. For uplink control, I will use HTB on WAN interface. For downlink, I plan to attach HTB on LAN interface(both egress/outgoing). No