search for: arrrgh

Just to be clear about this from the beginning, the lines: workgroup = yanlan local master = yes os level = 65 domain master = yes preferred master = yes All appear in my smb.conf and I am using samba 2.0.3 For some reason I seem to be unable to make the samba server believe that it should ble in the workgroup yanlan, e.g. when I execute "smbclient -L familysys" I get: Added

...e user's credentials from the email server. ?But, if the user is only created in AD, then Outlook complains that the incoming pop server won't authenticate the user, despite the fact that winbind is fired up, wbinfo -u shows the user, and getent passwd shows the user's credentials. Arrrgh! IMHO, this is the one small thing that keeps this from being a really great system. Can anybody show me the way to get over the hump? Many thanks. Dimitri -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

arrrgh, I'm trying to install the QLogic Linux Super Installer on a CentOS 6.4 server that has a QL2532, and getting... # ./qlinstall -i #*********************************************************# # HBA/CNAs Driver Installer for Linux # # Installer Version: 2.2...

Hello, I would like to get a correlation coefficient (R-squared) for my model. I don't know how to calculate it in R. What I've done so far: x<-8.5:32.5 #Vektor x y<-c(NA ,5.88 , 6.95 , 7.2 , 7.66 , 8.02 , 8.44 , 9.06, 9.65, 10.22 , 10.63 ,11.06, 11.37, 11.91 ,12.28, 12.69 ,13.07 , 13.5 , 13.3 ,14.14 , NA , NA , NA , NA , NA) #Vektor y

When I try to the code from library(survival) of library(ISwR), the following code survfit(Surv(days,status==1)) that could produce Kaplan-Meier estimates shows the following error "Error in survfit(Surv(days, status == 1)) : Survfit requires a formula or a coxph fit as the first argument" How it can be done in R.2.10 -- View this message in context:

This is my still-working-on-it code for btrfs directIO read. I''m posting it so people can see the progress being made on the project and can take an early shot at telling me this is just a bad idea and I''m crazy if they want to, or point out where I made some stupid mistake with btrfs core functions. The code is not complete and *NOT* ready for review or testing. I looked at

[Not important for message below; in this moment link from CRAN to the 'R Bug Tracking system (http://blueberry.kubism.ku.dk/R)' is down (at least, I get a "The requested URL /R was not found on this server." message)] To display properly this message, you mailer must handle properly latin1 encoding. With other encoding, I suppose that the role played by 'y

For reasons best known to myself, I call a python agi (PYST2 - love it!) which streams a series of very short files in quick succession. Like this: escape_digits = str("0") agi.stream_file(promptFile,escape_digits) and this is what I see on the AGI debug: <Local/s at root-00000061;2>AGI Tx >> 200 result=0 endpos=6784 <Local/s at root-00000061;2>AGI Rx <<

Dear R-users I hope someone could help me on this problem. I want to create a multiple kiteChart showing the real values with a scalebar on each indicating the scale . Here are some sample data to show what I want to achieve. Y <- read.table(textConnection("Sample1 Sample2 60 20 150 50 300

...only created >> in >> >> AD, >> >> > then Outlook complains that the incoming pop server won't authenticate the user, despite the fact that winbind is fired up, wbinfo -u shows >> the >> > user, and getent passwd shows the user's credentials. Arrrgh! IMHO, this is >> >> the >> >> > one small thing that keeps this from being a really great system. >> > >> > Can anybody show me the way to get over the hump? >> > >> > Many thanks. >> > >> > Dimitri >> > &gt...

I am working on our (newly renamed) authentication feature. The current scenario is: Scenario: Non-administrators should not set administrator ability Given I have no users And I add a user named "admin" as an administrator And I add a user named "myuser" as not an administrator When the user named "myuser" authenticates And the user

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major bug just waiting for v1.0 to be released. :) People wanting new features should start testing the upcoming v1.1. http://dovecot.org/nightly/

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major bug just waiting for v1.0 to be released. :) People wanting new features should start testing the upcoming v1.1. http://dovecot.org/nightly/