search for: apsrtabl

Hi all, I have used the apsrtable package to generate tables (using LaTeX and Sweave) for quite some. However, suddenly the notes option in the package appears to have stopped working (or I am doing something wrong). So, when I try to run the following commands (in the R console): > attach(NatExp.df) > model1.lm <- lm(...

...& 7 & 9 \\ (0.1) & (0.3) & (0.5) & (0.7) & (0.9) \\ 2 & 4 & 6 & 8 & 10 \\ (0.2) & (0.4) & (0.6) & (0.8) & (1.0) \\ except in proper Latex (or HTML). How can I do this from R? Someone mentioned the "apsrtable" package but that seems to require my having a model object. Thanks in advance folks. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I've got a question concerning the usage of robust standard errors in regression using lm() and exporting the summaries to LaTeX using the memisc-packages function mtable(): Is there any possibility to use robust errors which are obtained by vcovHC() when generating the LateX-output by mtable()? I tried to manipulate the lm-object by appending the "new" covariance

Hi, I have a number of multilevel models and I would like some Latex outputs of them. I usually use the "apsrtable" package, but it does not accept "lme" outputs. Neither does the "mtable" function in the "memisc" package. Is there any good alternative that I am missing? Thanks, Jonas

Hi - I have a series of 9 GAM regressions with about 5 parametric effects and three non-parametric effects in each. What is a good library or command for turning GAM outputs into publication-ready regression tables? I tried apsrtable and the mtable command in memisc but neither seemed to work with the gam output. I'd be okay with two separate tables - one for the parametric effects and one for the non-parametric effects. Best, David -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Generalized-Additive-M...

Hello Everyone (Quick) question: Does anyone know a package/command or simply a way of creating a table of different panel data estimations (estimated using /*plm()*/ ) just as *mtable()* does for models estimated with /*lm()*/? It seems *mtable* (and *apsrtable* equally) only support /*lm*/ and some other classes but unfortunately not /*plm*/. I am pretty sure others must have encountered this problem and I am hoping they found a way around it. If so: I am gratful for any advice/help or even just a hint. ManuelS -- View this message in context: http:...

...3 <0.001 "***" Group1 - Group3 == 0 -0.09396 0.01575 -5.965 <0.001 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ?***? 0.001 ?**? 0.01 ?*? 0.05 ?.? 0.1 ? ? 1 (Adjusted p values reported -- single-step method) I'm aware of libraries like stargazer, xtable, texreg, reporttools, memisc and apsrtable, but none of them does the job for glht :( Does anyone have any hints? Thanks and best regards Jan Winter

Dear all, I am trying to export my fixed effect results to Latex. I am using the plm package with the summary function. However, it does not look like apsrtable, stargazer, or any other package can accompany using the plm package. I am interested in a classic table with the coefficient in one row followed by the standard error in paranthesis in the next row and stars by the coefficient to show relevant coefficient level. coefficient 1 xxx** (xxx)...

Dear All, What is the preferred way to get Bayesian analysis results (such as those from MCMCpacki, MCMCglmm, and DPpackage) into LaTeX table automatically? I have been using the "apsrtable" package and similar functions in "memisc" package, but neither seems to handle MCMC output directly. Many thanks. Shige

Dear community, I had been looking for an easy way to produce latex tables from R output. xtable() and the package apsrtable produce good outputs but they are not exactly what I was looking for. I wrote this code that generates regression tables from multiple R linear models. I want to share it because it might be useful for someone else, and because I would appreciate comments on how to optimize the code. I'm als...

Hi, folks, I would like to copy the output of summary(lm) and anova (lm) in R to my word file. But the output will be a mess if I just copy after I call summary and anova. ##################### x=rnorm(10) y=rnorm(10,mean=3) lm=lm(y~x) summary(lm) Call: lm(formula = y ~ x) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -1.278567 -0.312017 0.001938 0.297578 1.310113

I'm in the process of converting some S3 methods to S4 methods. I have this function : setGeneric("enrichmentCalc", function(rs, organism, seqLen, ...){standardGeneric("enrichmentCalc")}) setMethod("enrichmentCalc", c("GenomeDataList", "BSgenome"), function(rs, organism, seqLen, ...) { ... ... ... })

CRAN (and crantastic) updates this week New packages ------------ * Bergm (1.0) Alberto Caimo http://crantastic.org/packages/Bergm Functions implementing Bayesian estimation for exponential random graph models via exchange algorithm Updated packages ---------------- lmtest (0.9-26), logcondens (1.3.5), MTSKNN (0.0-4), pmml (1.2.21), r2lUniv (0.9.4), rattle (2.5.11), rgdal (0.6-23),

CRAN (and crantastic) updates this week New packages ------------ * EffectStars (1.0) Maintainer: Unknown Author(s): Gunther Schauberger License: GPL-2 http://crantastic.org/packages/EffectStars The package provides functions to visualize regression models with categorical response. The effects of the covariates are plotted with star plots in order to allow for an optical

Who decides what features are in R and how they are implemented? If there is someone here who has that authority I have this request: A report() function analogous to the plot() function that makes it easy to generate a report from a table of data. This should not be in some auxiliary package, but part of the core R just like plot(). As a long time SAS user I cannot believe R does not have this.