search for: apr23

...ween different kernel versions, and all but the stock fedora core 1 kernel exhibits the same behavior. I have verified running this with both safe_asterisk (as I usually do) as well as manually at the command line with no difference in behavior. root 747 0.0 0.2 4248 1136 ? S Apr23 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk root 749 0.0 1.5 116328 7656 ? S Apr23 0:00 asterisk -vvvg -c root 750 0.0 1.5 116328 7656 ? S Apr23 0:00 asterisk -vvvg -c root 751 0.0 1.5 116328 7656 ? S Apr23 0:00 asterisk -vvvg -c root 75...

Hello, Just to follow up on this, we've hit over 16k (default client limit here) hibernated sessions: --- dovecot 119157 0.1 0.0 63404 56140 ? S Apr01 62:05 dovecot/imap-hibernate [11291 connections] dovecot 877825 0.2 0.0 28512 21224 ? S Apr23 1:34 dovecot/imap-hibernate [5420 connections] --- No issues other than the minor bug I reported, CPU usage is slight (at most 2% of a CPU core), memory savings are immense, so I'm a happy camper. Just out of curiosity, how does dovecot decide to split and spread out sessions between hibern...

..., > > Just to follow up on this, we've hit over 16k (default client limit here) > hibernated sessions: > --- > dovecot 119157 0.1 0.0 63404 56140 ? S Apr01 62:05 dovecot/imap-hibernate [11291 connections] > dovecot 877825 0.2 0.0 28512 21224 ? S Apr23 1:34 dovecot/imap-hibernate [5420 connections] > --- > > No issues other than the minor bug I reported, CPU usage is slight (at > most 2% of a CPU core), memory savings are immense, so I'm a happy camper. > > Just out of curiosity, how does dovecot decide to split and spre...

...t to follow up on this, we've hit over 16k (default client limit here) >> hibernated sessions: >> --- >> dovecot 119157 0.1 0.0 63404 56140 ? S Apr01 62:05 dovecot/imap-hibernate [11291 connections] >> dovecot 877825 0.2 0.0 28512 21224 ? S Apr23 1:34 dovecot/imap-hibernate [5420 connections] >> --- >> >> No issues other than the minor bug I reported, CPU usage is slight (at >> most 2% of a CPU core), memory savings are immense, so I'm a happy camper. >> >> Just out of curiosity, how does dovecot...

Hello, Dovecot 2.2.27 (Debian Jessie backports). When issuing a "doveadm kick" for a specific user I was greeted by: --- "warning: other connections would also be kicked from following users:" --- and a list of 22odd thousand users. As it turns out, kick wants to smack the hibernation proces(ses) that have hibernated sessions for this user, obviously the wrong approach here.

On 6 Apr 2017, at 21.14, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> imap-hibernate processes are similar to imap-login processes in that they >> should be able to handle thousands or even tens of thousands of connections >> per process. >> > > TL;DR: In a director/proxy setup, what's a good client_limit for >

I''m running SLES10 SP1 and have been using file:/ for my file-backed domUs. The domUs sit on a shared OCFS2 SAN-backed filesystem and are run on my three or four XEN servers. I''m having issues with the loopback devices not being released when the domUs shutdown or migrate, so I decided to switch over to tap:aio for my file-backed domUs. This isn''t working, either.