search for: amt2

Can you sum a few columns at a time? I tried x =Calc.find(:all, :select => "sum(amt1) amt1, sum(amt2) amt2" :conditions => ["where date > ?", date] ) The sql seems to function properly, but I wasn''t able to grab the values. These just failed x.amt1 x.send("amt1") I tried changing up the query to use sum(amt1) as amt1 sum(amt1) ''amt1''...

...ue, SDNPVariadic]>; def MYret : SDNode<"MYISD::RET_FLAG", SDTNone, [SDNPHasChain, SDNPOptInGlue, SDNPVariadic]>; let hasCtrlDep = 1, hasSideEffects = 1 in { def ADJCALLSTACKDOWN : Pseudo<(outs), (ins i32imm:$amt1, i32imm:$amt2), [(MYCallseqStart timm:$amt1, timm:$amt2)]>; def ADJCALLSTACKUP : Pseudo<(outs), (ins i32imm:$amt1, i32imm:$amt2), [(MYCallseqEnd timm:$amt1, timm:$amt2)]>; } def: Pat<(MYret), (JMP_Ret (i32 LR))>; The f...

...def MYret : SDNode<"MYISD::RET_FLAG", SDTNone, > [SDNPHasChain, SDNPOptInGlue, > SDNPVariadic]>; > > let hasCtrlDep = 1, hasSideEffects = 1 in { > def ADJCALLSTACKDOWN : Pseudo<(outs), (ins i32imm:$amt1, i32imm:$amt2), > [(MYCallseqStart timm:$amt1, > timm:$amt2)]>; > def ADJCALLSTACKUP : Pseudo<(outs), (ins i32imm:$amt1, i32imm:$amt2), > [(MYCallseqEnd timm:$amt1, timm:$amt2)]>; > } > > def: Pat<(MYre...

...SDTNone, [SDNPHasChain, SDNPOptInGlue, SDNPVariadic]>; let hasCtrlDep = 1, hasSideEffects = 1, isCodeGenOnly = 1, Defs = [SP], Uses = [SP] in { def ADJCALLSTACKDOWN : Pseudo<(outs), (ins i32imm:$amt1, i32imm:$amt2), [(MyCallseqStart timm:$amt1, timm:$amt2)]>; def ADJCALLSTACKUP : Pseudo<(outs), (ins i32imm:$amt1, i32imm:$amt2), [(MyCallseqEnd timm:$amt1, timm:$amt2)]>; } def Custom_CALL : Pseudo...

...013","12/01/2012","12/01/2012") df <- data.frame(Person,Amount,Date) I would like to transpose the Amount data so that I can get the total amount paid by person and date. So, it would look something like: ##Want it to look like: Person Date Amt1 Amt2 1 12/01/2012 100 10 1 01/01/2013 100 10 1 02/01/2013 100 10 2 12/01/2012 50 150 I have been working with reshape, but I am having trouble getting it to look exactly right. Thank you, K

...p;& "Expanded integer type size not a power of two!"); DebugLoc dl = N->getDebugLoc(); // Get the incoming operand to be shifted. SDValue InL, InH; GetExpandedInteger(N->getOperand(0), InL, InH); SDValue NVBitsNode = DAG.getConstant(NVTBits, ShTy); SDValue Amt2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, dl, ShTy, NVBitsNode, Amt); SDValue Cmp = DAG.getSetCC(dl, TLI.getSetCCResultType(ShTy), Amt, NVBitsNode, ISD::SETULT); SDValue Lo1, Hi1, Lo2, Hi2; switch (N->getOpcode()) { default: llvm_unreachable("Unknown shift"); case...

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Javier Martinez <javier at jmartinez.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working in adding support for 64-bit integers to my target. I'm using > LLVM to decompose the 64-bit integer operations by using 32-bit registers > wherever possible and emulating support where not. When looking at the bit > shift decomposition I saw what seems to be a

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass? > I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would > mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction > and just deleting code for handling its Expand and Promote. Are you > anticipating something more

On May 20, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Eli Friedman > <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Per subject, this patch adding an additional pass to handle vector >> >> operations; the idea is that this allows removing the code from >> >> LegalizeDAG that handles illegal types, which should be a significant

...etNode(ISD::SRA, dl, NVT, InH, Amt); // Lo part from Hi part. - return true; - } - } - - // If we know that the high bits of the shift amount are all zero, then we can - // do this as a couple of simple shifts. - if ((KnownZero & Mask) == Mask) { - // Compute 32-amt. - SDValue Amt2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, dl, Amt.getValueType(), - DAG.getConstant(NVTBits, Amt.getValueType()), - Amt); - - // Expand the incoming operand to be shifted, so that we have its parts - SDValue InL, InH; - ExpandOp(Op, InL, InH);...