search for: alltough

...Ref1', 'Ref2' ) , label = c( 'Label01', 'Label02' ) ) merge( x.vals, x.labels, by='ref', all.x = T, sort=F ) I received: ref id val label 1 Ref1 A1 1.11 Label01 2 Ref1 B3 3.33 Label01 3 Ref2 C2 2.22 Label02 Alltough 'sort=F' is set, the original order: id = A1, C2, B3 is not preserved. - Is there a possibility to preserve the original order (when there is no key field which can be ordered after merging). (Perhaps 'merge' is not the right solution for this problem?) Wolfram -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-....

...7:26 UTC _members took 0.0005321502685546 ms LIFE Jul 04 05:00:36 UTC _members took 0.0014369487762451 ms Jul 04 05:00:36 UTC _members took 0.0013291835784912 ms If I do this 300+ times, the outcome is very different. So my questions: - How can it be that the DELL takes so much longer alltough on the far better hardware? - How can it be allthough everything (software/os/plugins) is the same? - This even happens if the DELL is on low load (i.e. middle of the night) and only serves a few requests. Same software, same config, same database, same amount of data in the database yet on b...

...who should be thinking about how to implement this sort of thing) > If anyone else feels the same way or would like to discuss the idea I'd be > glad to hear it. > > Tony Arcieri David Balazic P.S.: I moved the thread in to the vorbis list, as suggested by monty, alltough it _is_ a developer thing ( and not really vorbis related ) --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe'...

...louder signal (5kHz) might mask the quieter one ( 5.2 kHz ) in both M and S channels ( provided there is a bitrate pressure ), thereby eliminating the 5.2 kHz signal. In short : M/S mode might consider parts of music masked, that would not be masked in regular stereo mode. This seems wrong to me, alltough is is possible that the brain would do this masking itself. So what is the comment of experts here ? Forgive me if I posted non-sense :-) David Balazic --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/

On 7/3/19 11:43 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: > - How can it be that the DELL takes so much longer alltough on the far better hardware? It looks like the DIY system has a CPU that's nearly twice as fast as the Dell's.? The additional CPU in the Dell will run more tasks concurrently, but it won't make a single process faster. You might also think that the SSD RAID would make the Dell fast...

On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:46:19AM -0700, Gordon Messmer (gordon.messmer at gmail.com) wrote: > On 7/3/19 11:43 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: > > - How can it be that the DELL takes so much longer alltough on the far better hardware? > It looks like the DIY system has a CPU that's nearly twice as fast > as the Dell's.? The additional CPU in the Dell will run more tasks > concurrently, but it won't make a single process faster. > > You might also think that the SSD RAID wou...

I'm running a lot of samba-servers (3.3.x) as AD members (security = ADS) here and they are working fine. For tests I updated one of my server to 3.4.0 and now have problems with lots of users accessing the shares.. Alltough there are still some users that always can access any share on the updated server, most of them cannot. Running samba with log level 3 gives the following logs (only part shown) Almost at the beginning of connection there is a difference at the following call: working client: [2009/07/07 10:35:43...

...ms > LIFE > Jul 04 05:00:36 UTC _members took 0.0014369487762451 ms > Jul 04 05:00:36 UTC _members took 0.0013291835784912 ms > If I do this 300+ times, the outcome is very different. > > > So my questions: > > - How can it be that the DELL takes so much longer alltough on the far > better hardware? > - How can it be allthough everything (software/os/plugins) is the same? > - This even happens if the DELL is on low load (i.e. middle of the night) > and > only serves a few requests. As others have said the DEV server is a generation newer CPU....

I was actually thinking of implementing something like this for ices, Such that the user could dynamically request songs to be streamed to the server. Makes it easier for wrapper applications (such as jukeboxes) to control the stream rather than relying on files and SIG's for RPC. Is there anything like this being planned? B At Tuesday 04:27 PM 4/2/2002, jaromil wrote: >On Tue, Apr

...ms > LIFE > Jul 04 05:00:36 UTC _members took 0.0014369487762451 ms > Jul 04 05:00:36 UTC _members took 0.0013291835784912 ms > If I do this 300+ times, the outcome is very different. > > > So my questions: > > - How can it be that the DELL takes so much longer alltough on the far > better hardware? > - How can it be allthough everything (software/os/plugins) is the same? > - This even happens if the DELL is on low load (i.e. middle of the night) > and > only serves a few requests. > > Same software, same config, same database, same amoun...

Hi. I want to broadcast FM radio. Can i pass data directly from my radio card to livecast and finally to my server, or must i pass data in the sound card after the radio card and before liveice? Thanks in advance, Bertrand. -------------- Jusqu'à 60 heures gratuites pour toute souscription à l'un des nouveaux Forfaits Liberty Surf

jaromil, > > > > wanted to ask again if someone has some online documentation on the > > icecast (or shoutcast) protocol at the socket/data level. > > have a look into MuSE/libmpeg/httpinput.cc (http://muse.dyne.org) > i hope that code can help you figuring out > No actually not. It just makes the connection to the shoutcast/icecast server. I've gotten this

Hi, Maybe a bit off topic for this list, bt anyway. I have received several feature requests for DarkIce to support downsampling of the audio input before passing it to lame or ogg vorbis. For example the audio read from the soundcard would be 44.1kHz, and lame would get it at 22.05kHz. I figure two ways of doing this: 1. For lame, one can specify the input and the desired mp3 sampling rate,

...tion - - Audio device handling has been rewritten - - FIFO pipes have been cleaned up - - continuous playmode and commandline encoder options have been fixed - - encoding of vorbis is now CBR and works with various samplerates :: EXPERIMENTAL FEATURES these features are introduced by this release, alltough they are not fully functional: experienced testing and contributions are very welcome! - - porting to OSX - - Jack support - - time based scheduler for radio automation - - Peer 2 peer streaming to Freedomnet/Proton ***** Supported servers: You can use MuSE to stream both MP3 or Ogg/Vorbis sou...

...tion - - Audio device handling has been rewritten - - FIFO pipes have been cleaned up - - continuous playmode and commandline encoder options have been fixed - - encoding of vorbis is now CBR and works with various samplerates :: EXPERIMENTAL FEATURES these features are introduced by this release, alltough they are not fully functional: experienced testing and contributions are very welcome! - - porting to OSX - - Jack support - - time based scheduler for radio automation - - Peer 2 peer streaming to Freedomnet/Proton ***** Supported servers: You can use MuSE to stream both MP3 or Ogg/Vorbis sou...

Hi, I have a very simple server setup, using shorewall as my firewall. I have a line like this at the top of my rules file to allow ssh connections, but limited to 3 connection per minute with a burst rate of 3: SSH/ACCEPT net $FW - - - - 3/min:3 - Now when I have that in place, and from a remote machine run scp server:/some/file ., I find