search for: agencourt

I have run a t.test in R, and received these results: Two Sample t-test data: rsa and umple t = 0.9819, df = 10, p-value = 0.3493 alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0 95 percent confidence interval: -76.1541 196.1541 sample estimates: mean of x mean of y 508.3333 448.3333 Can someone give me a detailed interpretation of the above results? Specifically,

I am in a situation where I have to fit a distrution, such as cauchy or normal, to an empirical dataset. Well and good, that is easy. But I wanted to assess just how good the fit is, using ks.test. I am concerned about the following note in the docs (about the example provided): "Note that the distribution theory is not valid here as we have estimated the parameters of the normal