search for: adivs

Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "adivs".

Did you mean: adi's
2007 Jul 28
8
generating symmetric matrices
Greetings, I have a seemingly simple task which I have not been able to solve today. I want to construct a symmetric matrix of arbtriray size w/o using loops. The following I thought would do it: p <- 6 Rmat <- diag(p) dat.cor <- rnorm(p*(p-1)/2) Rmat[outer(1:p, 1:p, "<")] <- Rmat[outer(1:p, 1:p, ">")] <- dat.cor However, the problem is that the matrix
2019 Jun 20
4
LastLogin update
Howdy, I'd like an adive on what to use. I have sql users, and i want to have the lastlogin of them, what is the native option for this: * Using last_login plugin which will give me the last login? * Use postlogin for imap and pop3n which will give me besides lastlogin the IP and protocol? Thanks in advanced, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
2007 Jul 30
3
Constructing correlation matrices
Greetings, I have a seemingly simple task which I have not been able to solve today and I checked all of the help archives on this and have been unable to find anything useful. I want to construct a symmetric matrix of arbtriray size w/o using loops. The following I thought would do it: p <- 6 Rmat <- diag(p) dat.cor <- rnorm(p*(p-1)/2) Rmat[outer(1:p, 1:p, "<")] <-
2007 May 11
2
megasr Sata Raid driver and the lastest kernel
Hi List I'm trying to update to the lastest kernel but I have a dirver that is not inculded in the distrubution, and I had to use the driver disk when installing centos 4.4 in the first place, The driver megasr .ko works fine with the installed kernel but I cannot find on for the updated kernel, any adive would be appreciated. without the updated driver there is a kernel panic on boot due to
2019 Jun 20
1
LastLogin update
Hi, Cool howto, and for protocol would this have that option also? From: dovecot <dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Minta via dovecot Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 18:37 To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Re: LastLogin update Hi, this seems to work very well: https://docs.iredmail.org/track.user.last.login.html You could also add "rip = $rip" in
2003 Sep 02
1
problems with mediatrix 1204 FXO
I'm having a problem getting outbound trunking to work using asterisk and an external SIP FXO. 7 digit dialing produces the following output: -- Executing Dial("SIP/mitel-fe17", "SIP/5925660@mediatrix-1204") in new stack -- Called 5925660@mediatrix-1204 -- SIP/mediatrix-1204-645e answered SIP/mitel-fe17 -- Attempting native bridge of SIP/mitel-fe17 and
2019 Jun 20
0
LastLogin update
Hi, this seems to work very well: https://docs.iredmail.org/track.user.last.login.html You could also add "rip = $rip" in "fields" for the ip address. On 6/20/19 3:24 PM, Jorge Bastos via dovecot wrote: > > Howdy, > > I?d like an adive on what to use. > > I have sql users, and i want to have the lastlogin of them, what is > the native option for this:
2007 Aug 29
0
Irq bug
Hi. I''m trying to setup the serial port access from the domU following the instructions at http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/InstallationNotes. So I addedd these configurations to the domU cfg file: irq = [ 4 ] ioports = [ "3f8-3ff" ] When I create this new domU I get this error: Error: function takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given) Is it a bug? I read on this list that you
2006 Oct 24
2
Mixed conditional logit model
dear all, i wonder whether it is possible to estimate a mixed (random parameters) logit model in R. my dataset only includes conditional explanatory (RHS) variables. i've already searched the R-help archives and found slightly comparable questions but no satisfying answers. an old fashoined conditional logit does not work due to the violation of the iia property. a short description of
2004 Feb 24
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM languages cooperation
Hello Chris, Chris Lattner wrote: >This really stems from >differing goals, though LLVM can certainly be used to compile MSIL-like >systems, so it's just a matter of specifying the rules and making the >front-ends stick to them. :) > > Ok, this is clear. Do you plan any "foreign function interface" or something similar that would ease, if not automate
2004 Feb 24
0
[LLVMdev] RE: LLVM languages cooperation
Chris Lattner wrote: > BTW, you might want to check out this document that Reid wrote, which > >describes his experiences writing a front-end for LLVM, and giving lots of >hints and tips: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/Stacker.html > > Thanks, I already had a quick look on it. Also thanks for your explanation on how the C++ back-end converts function calls to LLVM code. As
2004 May 04
0
[LLVMdev] FYI: ccg
Hi LLVMers, For your interest, I recently came across the ccg library "dynamic code generation for C and C++". --> http://www-sor.inria.fr/projects/vvm/realizations/ccg/ccg.html It seems to share some points with LLVM. -- Sébastien
2004 Jan 08
1
[LLVMdev] Re: idea 10
Hi Valery, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: >>To me this appears more as an algorithmic design issue, this function >>could be rewritten in "continuation passing style", and each >>continuation could be distributed by a load-balancing strategy to the >>computers sharing CPU resources. Using mechanisms such as "futures" (as >>in Mozart) allows to do
2004 Feb 24
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM languages cooperation
Hi all, I am an LLVM newbie, thinking about using LLVM as the platform for a toy language. In this respect, I was wondering if LLVM could be used to easily weave code written in different language. For instance, let's assume I have a library written in C, some components written in C++ and some components written in OCaml (we also assume an OCaml backend for LLVM). All this code gets
2004 Jan 08
1
[LLVMdev] Re: idea 10
Hello Valery, I have some comments regarding your thoughts on LLVM support for distributed computing. Valery A.Khamenya wrote: >There should be an engine and layer for making dispatching optimizations in run-time. If one CPU is loaded and code is >"parallelizable" why then not to send some part of >calculation to other CPU? This kind of on-fly decision will >be one day
2004 Jan 08
1
[LLVMdev] Re: idea 10
Hello again Valery, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > All benefits, what one could obtain from "LLVM supporting multiple CPU > at single host", one might obtaine from "LLVM supporting multiple CPU > at multiple hosts". Isn't that logical? I see more precisely what you mean, but I don't think it is that straightforward to generalise the benefits multiple CPU on