search for: abysmally

Hi, I''m wondering if it''s a known problem but recently I had to revert a production server from 1.8.6_p287 to 1.8.6_p114 because the performance was abysmal. ./script/runner took nearly 40s to load the Rails environment before doing anything useful on a Core2Duo 2.66GHz running Gentoo Linux 64bit. ./script/console was affected too (~40s to prompt) and our most used controller

I'm experiencing extremely slow performance when trying to copy files from and to a samba 4 share. I'm using Debian and the Samba 4 SerNet packages and everything is up to date on the client as well as on the server. The connection is made through 100Mbp/s ethernet, but the problem also exists on a local virtual machine that runs on the Debian server. By extremely I mean really abysmal:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7854 Summary: Abysmal sparse file performance Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: grarpamp at gmail.com

Hi all. I'm using Wine ( 1.1.4 ) to test some Flash stuff ( flex ) in IE6. IE6 runs quite well normally, but once Flash is loaded up, it goes VERY slowly indeed. I've done a quick sysprof profile ( http://entropy.homelinux.org/ie6_flash.sysprof ), and from what I can see ( and I'm most certainly no expert ), it looks like most CPU cycles are being burned in fbGetImage and fbCopyArea

I am running Win 98 SE and have a Samba server v2.0.5 on a FreeBSD 3.3 system. Both machines sit on the same 100baseTX subnet. I am seeing expected read performance, but writes from Win98 to the Samba share are terrible; upwards of 30 seconds to copy a 900kb file (yes, that's kb). This happens in both Explorer, the DOS "shell", and in the application that actually created the file

I have a 5.5GB file, mostly sparse. Tar performs far[!] better than rsync. I have no ideas yet, so just an FYI as to current state. FreeBSD 8.1 i386 zfs Yes, I know the blocks used differs but don't know why yet, could be just how zfs does things or related to the large amount of sparseness. There are no media errors, CPU/IO load or anything like that and the source and dest paths are on the

hi guys I have rather a large set of Seagate's SAS ST32000444SS, over a hundred - experience I'm having from those in conjunction with their tech support is abysmal. I'm trying to update firmware of these drives and nothing works, including tech support. ... and I cannot help but wonder - is just me who is so unlucky and getting very, very poor support(taking naturally only of

Everyone, I'm at the last straw. For at least 5 to 6 months I have tried to get Samba 2.0.6 and Samba 2.0.7 to interoperate with Windows 98, with only partial success. Whenever a Windows machine does an SMB query of the master browser on my network, it takes an abysmally long time to respond. Whenever a Windows machine attempts to print, it becomes unstable and starts crashing. I'm attaching my smb.conf file for review. Thanks, Brad ===== Brad Chapman Permanent e-mails: kakadu_croc@yahoo.com jabiru_croc@yahoo.com Alternate e-mails: kakadu@adelphia.net...

I'm trying to do an fsck on an ext3 partition but I'm seeing abysmally slow disk throughput; monitoring with "dstat" (like vmstat) shows ~1200-1500KB/s throughput to the disks. Even with 24hrs of fsck-ing I only get ~3% (still in pass1). The filesystem is ext3 running "e2fsck -C0 /dev/sda3" and about 3.7TB on an x86_64-based system with 4GB RAM....

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sep 19, 2014, at 9:42 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto at amacapital.net> wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Christopher Covington >> <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: >>> On 09/17/2014 10:50 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>>> Hi all- >>>>

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sep 19, 2014, at 9:42 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto at amacapital.net> wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Christopher Covington >> <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: >>> On 09/17/2014 10:50 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>>> Hi all- >>>>

Hello. I am setting up a smb server running debian etch for a small office. Due to circumstances outside my control, most of the client machines are running Windows Vista Ultimate. The shares are all set up properly, security is set, and we're good to go. Except that the throughput from any of the Vista machines to the server is at best slow and at worst abysmal. After tweaking the

...ild something that wanted ms-extensions on OpenBSD. Long story short, didn't work so well, because all system includes lead to <machine/_types.h> #ifndef __cplusplus typedef int __wchar_t; #endif and since ms-extensions includes __char_t as a built-in, this did fail abysmally. It would be simple to fix in OpenBSD, assuming clang did tell us it was using ms-extensions. Would something like this be appropriate ? macro name subject to approval of course. Index: lib/Frontend/InitPreprocessor.cpp =================================================================== RCS fil...

On 09/19/2014 05:46 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 09/19/2014 01:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> >>> However, it sounds to me that at least for KVM, it is very easy just to emulate the RDRAND instruction. The hypervisor would report to the guest that RDRAND is supported in CPUID and the emulate the instruction when guest executes it. KVM already traps guest #UD (which would

On 09/19/2014 05:46 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 09/19/2014 01:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> >>> However, it sounds to me that at least for KVM, it is very easy just to emulate the RDRAND instruction. The hypervisor would report to the guest that RDRAND is supported in CPUID and the emulate the instruction when guest executes it. KVM already traps guest #UD (which would

I THINK YOUR A VERY SAD BUNCH OF LIFES WAISTERS On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:00 PM, <rsync-request at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Send rsync mailing list submissions to > ? ? ? ?rsync at lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > ? ? ? ?https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > or, via email, send a message with subject or body

Hi all, In our office we use a program that makes many small writes to a file. We have been trying to use this program with our NAS, which hosts a Samba share on the network. However, the performance of the program is staggeringly slow on Window 7, 8.1, and 10. To make the problem easily repeatable, I created a small C++ program to just write 1 million lines to a file:

I''ve been monitoring the lists for a while now but didn''t see this problem mentioned in particular: I''ve got a fairly standard desktop system at home, 700gb WD drive, nothing special, with 2 btrfs filesystems and some snapshots. The system runs for days, and I''ve noticed unusual disk activity the other evening - turns out that it''s taking forever to

(This subthread is more appropriate to -users than to -dev, so it is crossposted only to mark its transition. Please reply on the -user list only.) What are the cheapest prices for (humans) transcribing voicemail to text as a service? The absolute cheapest, regardless of (known) quality - the quality only has to compete with (cheaper) automated transcription, which is abysmal quality. On Wed,

Hi, I realise this is probably the wrong list for such a question, but I need a pointer to somewhere I can get some feedback on experience of (business class) voip providers for the UK? Situation is that we are currently with Gradwell and use them for an inbound/outbound single line for a business and their quality has gone from excellent to abysmal in the last few weeks. I'm sure they