search for: _were_

This is important and may be affecting you if you use :select to minimize the columns you need on big queries. If you use :select to define which columns you need and you have not included all the columns you defined in the :acts_as_ferret field definitions you''ll clear the content of those fields on the ferret index. And that may corrupt your index. So, if you have in your model:

...fundamental data types." > > So the structures map _directly_ on to the vector types - not on to > wrappers around the vector types. But regardless they are still structures, right? What does it mean for them to map onto other types? Is the parser supposed to treat them as if they _were_ those other types? If so, I think you need to define a type system for those fundamental vector types. I had read those statements to say something about the data types used in the generated code. > >> The fields of the structure may be different in >> this implementation, but th...

Well, I wake up this morning, and aussievoip isn't up. I ring godaddy, who _were_ hosting it, and they say that the machine's been compromised, and you can't have your data. Nyah Nyah. I spent 1 hour and 38 minutes on the phone to them, trying to convince them to let me somehow get access to it, but to no avail. I've reported it to the Australian Federal Police High...

...if it will run on Chrome OS? Linux is Linux, after all. > ... > (I also don't know if you can even run any third-party binary > executables on Chrome OS if you are not in developer mode.) I very much doubt that Chrome OS would make this possible, given its focus on security. (If it _were_ possible to exec a user-supplied file in normal mode, one could do all sorts of interesting things with executable shell scripts -- like setting DISPLAY to point to some other machine.) While it would certainly be possible to import a blob that happened to be a binary for some CPU type (into, say,...

On 22 September 2010 03:43, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote: > But regardless they are still structures, right?  What does it mean for them to map onto other types?  Is the parser supposed to treat them as if they _were_ those other types?  If so, I think you need to define a type system for those fundamental vector types.  I had read those statements to say something about the data types used in the generated code. Hi Bob, Just tested with plain vectors and LLVM's back-end seems to get them all right. Plain...

...eded to specify both my machine names and my network address under "hosts allow" to have the shares shareable to the Windows machine (Bjarne). I'm pretty sure my hosts allow is right. I don't have a hosts deny section. I've pored through the diagnostic tests and while there _were_ things wrong that I have fixed, I can't find anything I can do that makes a difference. Thanks for any enlightenment you can give me. Mike -- Michael D. Crawford GoingWare Inc. - Expert Software Development and Consulting http://www.goingware.com/ crawford@goingware.com Tilting at Windmi...

> They are defined as structures. The table in A.2 defines the exact > structure names. There is a requirement to mangle them as those > structures in A.2.1. The mangling requirement doesn't require you to meet it in any particular way as long as you end up with the right strings. I.e. the mangling requirement places no requirements at all on the implementation, outside of mangled

..., and why Apple migrated to them in the first place. Shouldn't a dynamic library containing only the relevant parts (e.g. the dynamic symbol table) be roughly comparable in size? And, much simpler to support? I assume that's effectively what "Mach-O Dynamic Library Stubs" actually _were_, before the introduction of TBD files, so presumably there were good reasons for switching? If anyone wants to do something similar for another platform (that is to say, ELF; COFF already has import libraries), I'd suggest that the sensible way to do so would be to generate actual shared objec...

...S? Linux is Linux, after all. >> ... >> (I also don't know if you can even run any third-party binary >> executables on Chrome OS if you are not in developer mode.) > > I very much doubt that Chrome OS would make this possible, given its > focus on security. (If it _were_ possible to exec a user-supplied > file in normal mode, one could do all sorts of interesting things > with executable shell scripts -- like setting DISPLAY to point to > some other machine.) > > While it would certainly be possible to import a blob that happened > to be a binary...

...in 2 posts before I even responded. If you look at other threads, I'm typically responding "OT" after 2-3 people have done so, and I largely see an inaccuracy, or I see a correction very much necessary. [ My posts on that thread _prior_ had just been to inform people that yes, there _were_ Xeon and Itanium systems with hot-swap capability. ] That's all I was trying to do in this case. Not "prove you wrong." -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org

...ately it seems I can't. On the machine I have php-mssql installed, and it appears that there is no php53-mssql. php-mssql is built from the php-extras SRPM, so is there going to be a php53-extras SRPM? I've checked upstream, and they also don't have a php53-mssql package, so if there _were_ to be solved it'd have to be in the 'Extras' repository I guess... Cheers, John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake

Greetings, There is a "max connections" limit when using rsync --daemon, as per the rsyncd.conf file (default is 0). Is there also one when rsync --server (on the target node) is us used (in the absence of a rsyncd.conf file) ? If so, would there be a warning message like "max connections (#) reached - try again later" ? (using 2.5.4 on aix 5.2 for source and target)

Having found no mention of Google's Chrome OS in the rsync archives, nor any useful* pointers via Google, I'm wondering if anyone here knows of an implementation of rsync client for Chrome OS in normal (not developer) mode, i.e. as an app or extension. * It seems that rsync is available in "test" builds of Chrome OS, but not in normal release builds. As far as I can tell,

On Sep 27, 2010, at 2:58 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 22 September 2010 03:43, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote: >> But regardless they are still structures, right? What does it mean for them to map onto other types? Is the parser supposed to treat them as if they _were_ those other types? If so, I think you need to define a type system for those fundamental vector types. I had read those statements to say something about the data types used in the generated code. > > Hi Bob, > > Just tested with plain vectors and LLVM's back-end seems to get th...

> On 25 May 2018, at 01:46, Aaron via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > LLVM optimization pass gives an error "Terminator found in the middle of a basic block!" since basic block IR may have multiple "ret" instructions. It seems LLVM does not accept multiple return in a basic block by default. > Yes, if you’re inserting

Hi all, LLVM optimization pass gives an error "Terminator found in the middle of a basic block!" since basic block IR may have multiple "ret" instructions. It seems LLVM does not accept multiple return in a basic block by default. Is there a specific optimization or pass that I can enable to remove unreachable codes in basic blocks? Best, Aaron -------------- next part

..., and why Apple migrated to them in the first place. Shouldn't a dynamic library containing only the relevant parts (e.g. the dynamic symbol table) be roughly comparable in size? And, much simpler to support? I assume that's effectively what "Mach-O Dynamic Library Stubs" actually _were_, before the introduction of TBD files, so presumably there were good reasons for switching? File size is one reason. A TBD file is typically one third the size of the corresponding stub library for a single architecture. Multiple architectures dramatically increase the TBD advantage: a new archite...

In message <73645861681468542 at scdbackup.webframe.org>, "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup at gmx.net> wrote: >me: >> > Check whether it fails with Clonezilla. >Ronald F. Guilmette: >> Please be specific. For Clonezilla, there are many different versions > >Any failure on the same stick which also succeeds is enough >to kill the theory of bad

...ew wrote: > > Theo De Raadt pointed out (possibly not in this thread) that basing > > protection on euid is not workable. Although I like the concept of > > variable expansion in pathnames, I don''t see it as a security mechanism. > > Why not? Because programs that _were_ privileged but have set euid == ruid will put the tmpfile into a directory to which the user has access, I guess - and that''s the root of the problem; the tmpfile _must_ be inaccessible to all but the processes which actually need it. > Right! very important point: "not particular...

If we change our default subvolume, btrfs receive will fail to find subvolume. To fix this problem, i have two ideas. 1.make btrfs snapshot ioctl support passing source subvolume''s objectid 2.when we want to using interval subvolume path, we mount it other place that use subvolume 5 as its default subvolume. We''d better use the second approach because it won''t bother