search for: _someone_

http://www.cafepress.com/rubyonrailsshop > 1. Ruby/Rails T-Shirts/graphics? (Joe) > Hey, I was just wondering - are there any Ruby and/or Rails t-shirts > available? Or nice, big graphics available to make your own?

Is it appropriate to use stepAIC (library MASS) with coxph objects (from library survival5) that use "cluster(id)"? It is my understanding that, when using "cluster(id)", we can test for sets of terms by using the methods in Wei et al., (1989; JASA, 84: 1065-1073), or as explained in pp. 53 and ff. of the survival.ps document. But if we use a likelihood ratio test instead

The esteemed Emmett seems to have given an integer decoder license to Empeg free of charge. Soon, you'll be able to play Ogg Vorbis in your car. Spectacular. I'm headed to Vorbis.com to donate some cash. I'd like to encourage anyone else who feels the same to do so. http://empeg.comms.net/php/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=hackers_prog&Number=85604

...o that other poor sods like me won't in future be beset by these issues? (For my part, *I* have already ordered a new/replacement motherboard, so all of this work we've done is not likely to benefit me directly. But I would like to think that it hasn't all been wasted effirt, and that _someone_ may benefit.)) >I have my own resources' limitations. Preparing special images with a >size of several GB and uploading them in hopes they will work as >expected is beyond my current possibilities. Why? Are you on a dial-up line? >I would like to ask from you to _at least try_...

Dear all, I am confused with the output of survfit.coxph. Someone said that the survival given by summary(survfit.coxph) is the baseline survival S_0, but some said that is the survival S=S_0^exp{beta*x}. Which one is correct? By the way, if I use "newdata=" in the survfit, does that mean the survival is estimated by the value of covariates in the new data frame? Thank you very much!

...ds like me won't in > future be beset by these issues? (For my part, *I* have already > ordered a new/replacement motherboard, so all of this work we've done > is not likely to benefit me directly. But I would like to think that > it hasn't all been wasted effirt, and that _someone_ may benefit.)) > "Mr. Syslinux" would be H. Peter Anvin (hpa), as the initial copyright line shows when booting Syslinux. Regarding UBCD, Clonezilla (and GParted) Live, I happen to know that they are working on improving bootability. Regarding improving Syslinux, feedback is the...

Dear fellow Xen''ers! I''m having a problem with my new Xen-enabled colocation server.. I hope ( at least ;) ) one of you guys know how to fix this problem.. For a certain amount of time ( 1-2 days ) the domU runs fine.. until the console starts spitting out messages like these: [80182.004456] clocksource/0: Time went backwards: delta=-6917292717540055641 shadow=80182004054805

...oject. In light of that, it is amazing to see the level Mr. Segher Boessenkool drops down to in the last posts. More or less calling people insane and accusing them of being on crack and what not. I didn't want to post this on the list, for there is no reason to promote further flaming, but _someone_ should take action against Mr. Boessenkool; this is rather absurd in my oppinion. -- Sune Foldager DIKU - Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from t...

I am getting tons of these messages since I updated to 4.2 Nov 12 12:21:39 srv1 dbus: Can't send to audit system: USER_AVC pid=2839 uid=81 loginuid=-1 message=avc: denied { send_msg } for scontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t tcontext=user_u:system_r:initrc_t tclass=dbus Now I can see this process... # ps aux|grep 2839 dbus 2839 0.0 0.3 16168 1888 ? Ssl Nov11 0:13 dbus-

> > In message <BLU0-SMTP2805E16A0E7A33B925EDF458BB80 at phx.gbl>, > Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Now, to move forward with Clonezilla in your USB drive, we need to > >proceed with some steps that are not as simple as dd'ing an image. > > Apologies for my impertinence, but I have one question: Why? > > I was under the impression