search for: _show

Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- src/app/views/task/_show.rhtml | 4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/app/views/task/_show.rhtml b/src/app/views/task/_show.rhtml index f4e001d..ff7d434 100644 --- a/src/app/views/task/_show.rhtml +++ b/src/app/views/task/_show.rhtml @@ -75,7 +75,9 @@ <img src="im...

...e_attributes!(params[:user]) redirect_to @user, :status => 202, :text => render_to_string(:partial => "users/show", :type => "json", :locals => {:user => @user}) #notice, that redirect_to was reinitialized and :text is a parameter for response_body end _show.tokamak user { id user.id email user.email username user.username } spec file it "should NOT update user username" do username = @user.username put ''update'', :id => @user.id, :user => {:username => username +"abc"}, :format => :jso...

...Yuji Shimada <shimada-yxb@necst.nec.co.jp> diff -r 618fc299e2f1 -r 4769a6db78f5 drivers/acpi/pci_root.c --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c Thu Dec 18 11:51:36 2008 +0000 +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c Thu Dec 25 10:37:52 2008 +0900 @@ -151,6 +151,36 @@ return AE_OK; } +ssize_t +acpi_device_seg_show(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev, char *buf) +{ + struct list_head *entry; + + list_for_each(entry, &acpi_pci_roots) { + struct acpi_pci_root *root; + root = list_entry(entry, struct acpi_pci_root, node); + if (root->device == acpi_dev) + return sprintf(buf, "%04x\n", root->id...

...b() */ #define module_param_call(name, set, get, arg, perm) \ diff --git a/include/linux/sysfs.h b/include/linux/sysfs.h index 30b2ebee6439..f517e6e488c8 100644 --- a/include/linux/sysfs.h +++ b/include/linux/sysfs.h @@ -71,7 +71,8 @@ struct attribute_group { */ #define __ATTR(_name, _mode, _show, _store) { \ - .attr = {.name = __stringify(_name), .mode = _mode }, \ + .attr = {.name = __stringify(_name), \ + .mode = VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(_mode) }, \ .show = _show, \ .store = _store, \ }

...b() */ #define module_param_call(name, set, get, arg, perm) \ diff --git a/include/linux/sysfs.h b/include/linux/sysfs.h index 30b2ebee6439..f517e6e488c8 100644 --- a/include/linux/sysfs.h +++ b/include/linux/sysfs.h @@ -71,7 +71,8 @@ struct attribute_group { */ #define __ATTR(_name, _mode, _show, _store) { \ - .attr = {.name = __stringify(_name), .mode = _mode }, \ + .attr = {.name = __stringify(_name), \ + .mode = VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(_mode) }, \ .show = _show, \ .store = _store, \ }

I have been trying all kinds of different ways to produce what I think should be a simple effect, but have not had any luck yet and apparently I am not following the general idea... What I am trying to accomplish is the following (part 1 works and part 2 does not): 1. One of my views has a link_to_remote which updates a div container with a table of data my example is <div

...rhtml | 4 ++-- src/app/views/smart_pools/show_hosts.rhtml | 9 ++++----- src/app/views/smart_pools/show_pools.rhtml | 9 ++++----- src/app/views/smart_pools/show_storage.rhtml | 9 ++++----- src/app/views/smart_pools/show_vms.rhtml | 9 ++++----- src/app/views/task/_show.rhtml | 19 +++++++++++-------- src/app/views/user/_show.rhtml | 7 ++++--- src/public/images/no-grid-items.png | Bin 15004 -> 0 bytes src/public/stylesheets/components.css | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- 14 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 81...

...cess will get stuck, it will return if we kill dd process. We have some static variables (eg, current_rng, data_avail, etc) in hw_random/core.c, they are protected by rng_mutex. I try to workaround this issue by undelay(100) after mutex_unlock() in rng_dev_read(). This gives chance for hwrng_attr_*_show() to get mutex. This patch also contains some cleanup, moving some code out of mutex protection. Do you have some suggestion? Thanks. diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c index aa30a25..fa69020 100644 --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c +++ b/drivers/char/h...

...cess will get stuck, it will return if we kill dd process. We have some static variables (eg, current_rng, data_avail, etc) in hw_random/core.c, they are protected by rng_mutex. I try to workaround this issue by undelay(100) after mutex_unlock() in rng_dev_read(). This gives chance for hwrng_attr_*_show() to get mutex. This patch also contains some cleanup, moving some code out of mutex protection. Do you have some suggestion? Thanks. diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c index aa30a25..fa69020 100644 --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c +++ b/drivers/char/h...

...View: <%= link_to_remote "Show/Hide", :update => "details", :url => { :action => "show", :id => leif } %> <p id="details"></p> Action: def show @leif = Leif.find(params[:id]) render_partial ''show'' end _show.rhtml: <% for column in Leif.content_columns %> <p> <b><%= column.human_name %>:</b> <%=h @leif.send(column.name) %> </p> <% end %> Any tips or ideas would be appreciated -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello, I am very new to ruby on rails and I am facing little problem with image_tag. I have two controller product and items. In product view, I have a partial called _show.html.erb. And in items view, i call index of item to display all products. The problem is, when user clicks on the image_tag of the items view, i want to call partial of product view i.e _show.html.erb. Please help me :) thanks, derp -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received t...

The following two patches should be applied in the order: * [PATCH server] Add svc_vm_actions method to VmService. * [PATCH server] Cloud UI layer to initiate actions on vms. The service layer patch should work fine on its own (and not break anything), but cloud patch relies on service being there.

...l the way from one domain to sub domain and even action gets triggered but, I can not get the response back to the main domain. So, is there any way to send a callback to main domain. I just want to reflect changes there at the form which is inside div_contentdiv and want to replace with content of _show.html.erb which I have on my sub domain. Many Thanks, Surya :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe...

...ch_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, + struct device *dev); +static int __iommu_attach_group(struct iommu_domain *domain, + struct iommu_group *group); +static void __iommu_detach_group(struct iommu_domain *domain, + struct iommu_group *group); + #define IOMMU_GROUP_ATTR(_name, _mode, _show, _store) \ struct iommu_group_attribute iommu_group_attr_##_name = \ __ATTR(_name, _mode, _show, _store) @@ -221,10 +231,29 @@ int iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev) goto err_free_dev_param; } - if (ops->probe_device) + if (ops->probe_device) { + struct iommu_group *group; +...

This resend includes the rebase, but fixes a problem I just noticed with nil/empty checks.

...perm) \ > diff --git a/include/linux/sysfs.h b/include/linux/sysfs.h > index 30b2ebee6439..f517e6e488c8 100644 > --- a/include/linux/sysfs.h > +++ b/include/linux/sysfs.h > @@ -71,7 +71,8 @@ struct attribute_group { > */ > > #define __ATTR(_name, _mode, _show, _store) { \ > - .attr = {.name = __stringify(_name), .mode = _mode }, \ > + .attr = {.name = __stringify(_name), \ > + .mode = VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(_mode) }, \ > .show = _...

This is a resend of the 2-patch series from a week or so ago, needed to be rebased due to some commits on next

...ock/xen-blkfront.c | 7 ++-- 25 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 164 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-integrity.c b/block/blk-integrity.c index feb30570eaf5..6121611e1316 100644 --- a/block/blk-integrity.c +++ b/block/blk-integrity.c @@ -333,34 +333,34 @@ static ssize_t integrity_device_show(struct blk_integrity *bi, char *page) } static struct integrity_sysfs_entry integrity_format_entry = { - .attr = { .name = "format", .mode = S_IRUGO }, + .attr = { .name = "format", .mode = 0444 }, .show = integrity_format_show, }; static struct integrity_sysfs_entry i...

...ock/xen-blkfront.c | 7 ++-- 25 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 164 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-integrity.c b/block/blk-integrity.c index feb30570eaf5..6121611e1316 100644 --- a/block/blk-integrity.c +++ b/block/blk-integrity.c @@ -333,34 +333,34 @@ static ssize_t integrity_device_show(struct blk_integrity *bi, char *page) } static struct integrity_sysfs_entry integrity_format_entry = { - .attr = { .name = "format", .mode = S_IRUGO }, + .attr = { .name = "format", .mode = 0444 }, .show = integrity_format_show, }; static struct integrity_sysfs_entry i...

...ean we shouldn't fix the issue here...) > We have some static variables (eg, current_rng, data_avail, etc) in hw_random/core.c, > they are protected by rng_mutex. I try to workaround this issue by undelay(100) > after mutex_unlock() in rng_dev_read(). This gives chance for hwrng_attr_*_show() > to get mutex. > > This patch also contains some cleanup, moving some code out of mutex > protection. > > Do you have some suggestion? Thanks. > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c > index aa30a25..fa69020 100644 > -...