search for: _msdsc

Instead of the jpg image l write like this: DNS Master on the DC domain controller (Windows Server 2008 R2) DNS DC Reverse Lookup Zones beo.imp _msdsc dc domains gc pdc _sites .......... In the window - _msdsc 246933f5-768e-4399-9adb-251271d245e3 (CNAME) dcs3.beo.imp ................................. (CNA...

...EL 8 Server, compiled & installed samba. 3. The problems started when I attempted to add the samba as an additional DC. It always tried to find itself (non-existent server) as a writeable DC. This is when I found that SOA record in new samba 4.18.0 server was pointing to the dead server in _msdsc.example.com, which I could not remove either in RSAT or using samba-tool. Although there was new SOA entry in Forward Zone pointing to new samba 4.18.0, the domain join process always found itself (non-existent server) as a writeable DC. 4. I did try to modify the _msdsc records in DNS and samb...

...gt; installed samba. > > 3. The problems started when I attempted to add the samba as an > additional DC. It always tried to find itself (non-existent server) as a > writeable DC. This is when I found that SOA record in new samba 4.18.0 > server was pointing to the dead server in _msdsc.example.com, which I > could not remove either in RSAT or using samba-tool. Although there was > new SOA entry in Forward Zone pointing to new samba 4.18.0, the domain > join process always found itself (non-existent server) as a writeable DC. > > 4. I did try to modify the _msds...

On 30/04/2020 11:44, Olaf Dreyer wrote: > Hi, > > I restored the last backup with the 4.11.6 setup. This is working fine > and i can confirm that my AD is set up with a single forwarding zone, > there is no _msdsc zone. On this 4.11.6 setup also the Windows DNS > Tool does not complain. When upgrading to 4.12.2 DNS administration > fails again with WERR_DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE. > > I will try the steps described in the MS document? and come back with > the results. I think both Andrew and...

.... >> >> 3. The problems started when I attempted to add the samba as an >> additional DC. It always tried to find itself (non-existent server) >> as a writeable DC. This is when I found that SOA record in new samba >> 4.18.0 server was pointing to the dead server in _msdsc.example.com, >> which I could not remove either in RSAT or using samba-tool. Although >> there was new SOA entry in Forward Zone pointing to new samba 4.18.0, >> the domain join process always found itself (non-existent server) as >> a writeable DC. >> >> 4....

...using net vampire after rolling back to commit 62e0a74 to bypass mdw updates that broke net vampire. (pdc2) I had to manually add to the zone in pdc1 the follwoing records to get replication to work: I made all the modifications in named.txt to bind pdc2 IN A 192.168.48.236 <PDC2-GUID>._msdsc IN CNAME pdc2 scp the dns.keytab file from pdc1 to pdc2 modified smb.conf on pdc2 as follows nsupdate command = /usr/bin/nsupdate -v -k /usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab The dns update doesn't happen: on pdc2 i get the following message: 11-Jun-2010 07:30:16.956 /usr/local/samb...

On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 13:11:27 +0300 Bee Air via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Good day! > Test the dynamic DNS updates > > # samba_dnsupdate --verbose > IPs: ['200.2.2.15'] > Looking for DNS entry A dcs3.BEO.IMP 200.2.2.15 as dcs3.BEO.IMP. > Looking for DNS entry CNAME > 246933f5-768e-4399-9adb-251271d245e3._msdcs.BEO.IMP dcs3.BEO.IMP as >

G'Day Olaf, If this was working before, then it would be this bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14310 I'm a bit swamped right now, per Microsoft the correct fix is for our DNS Management server to ignore these values. Can you see if your error looks like this in the server logs? Andrew Bartlett On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 18:53 +0200, Olaf Dreyer via samba wrote: > Well,

....04.2020 um 12:57 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 30/04/2020 11:44, Olaf Dreyer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I restored the last backup with the 4.11.6 setup. This is working >> fine and i can confirm that my AD is set up with a single forwarding >> zone, there is no _msdsc zone. On this 4.11.6 setup also the Windows >> DNS Tool does not complain. When upgrading to 4.12.2 DNS >> administration fails again with WERR_DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE. >> >> I will try the steps described in the MS document? and come back with >> the results. >...

...just fine for us. Then I felt I needed to jump the gun a bit on the XP situation (before a user did it:) So I installed XP on a laptop and started testing.. First it did NOT want to allow me access to the Domain due to the fact that we didn't specify the "funny names MS DNS stuff" (_msdsc.domain) Well I did this and got into the domain, the roaming profile worked..whippy! BUT (of course) now I was unable to access the Samba server. Okay...I change the XP machine to a Workgroup setup instead of a domain setup..boing!.. I get access to the Samba shares and the Domain shares when aut...

...sting Samba4 as a DC from a existing Win2k3 Domain. Everything is running, but we noticed the following strange things: 1) We cannot manager the Samba DNS "server" by Windows DNS manger tool; 2) The domain zone, i.e. mydomain.com zone, do not exists at Samba4 DNS. All of the others (i.e. _msdsc.mydomain.com, , etc) exists. 3) We cannot ADD an entry in Samba DNS, (using samba-tool dns add mysambasrv mydomain.com bl? bl? bl?). The system returns an error like "name doesn't exists". At the WindowsDC, I can see de mydomain.com zone, the registers and I can ADD, Delete, etc. If I...

Hi, I restored the last backup with the 4.11.6 setup. This is working fine and i can confirm that my AD is set up with a single forwarding zone, there is no _msdsc zone. On this 4.11.6 setup also the Windows DNS Tool does not complain. When upgrading to 4.12.2 DNS administration fails again with WERR_DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE. I will try the steps described in the MS document? and come back with the results. Best regards, Olaf Am 29.04.2020 um 22:03 sch...

...> 7. dnsmasq? Ok, i just hope these are not running on the DC's. > > It's running on the gateways to cache the DCs' responses and > handle some auxiliary stuff. ad.tao.at and all subdomains are > transparently forwarded to the DCs, no difference in > responses for _msdsc etc. between them and querying the DCs directly. Ok, thats fine then. > > >> Last message, where I mentioned the replication bug: > >> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-April/207918.html > >> > >>> Own and if you dont use it, ApacheDirectoryStud...

Hai Sven, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Sven Schwedas [mailto:sven.schwedas at tao.at] > Verzonden: dinsdag 5 september 2017 17:13 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Server GC/name.dom/dom is not > registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): > Server (GC/name/dom at DOM) unknown > > On