search for: _extra_

I realize this is sorta off topic but my searches using Google have got me mostly no where. So I thought I'd ask here as there is a lot of _past Postfix_ mail handling issues discussed. The issue is; I have to deal with a lot of messages that come from MS Outlook users and sometimes they are replies to replies to replies ... My reading indicates it has a little to do with HTML composed

...very time I have to think twice before making another member function which is invoked in deeper stack frames. In other words, just imagine the situation, when for a given object really a lot of *its* members function are called without changing `this'. Today compilers can't eliminate this _extra_ `this'. And real C++ code has tendency to be slower. I'd say it is not just a problem of current compilers. It is problem of ultimate static compilation. In cases when `this' comes in run-time even a super-smart static compilers can't recompile a function with "built-in"...

...500Mhz. If you need more info please let me know. it is a basic unit with raid controller and a Gig of DRAM etc. may i ask what others are putting in their "additional boot options" so that the units can he remotely shutdown to power off and/or rebooted without hanging please? also, any _extra_ tips and tricks are certainly welcome. again, i am grateful to those people that have been helping me off-list as well! take care and kind regards, -- Robert Hanson Abba Communications http://www.abbacomm.net

...or that reason, they are typically all inlined, eliminating the parameter passing completely... > In other words, just imagine the situation, when for a given object > really a lot of *its* members function are called without changing > `this'. Today compilers can't eliminate this _extra_ `this'. And real > C++ code has tendency to be slower. I really am not sure I understand what transformation you are proposing. Can you elaborate more? :) Thanks, -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

It turns out that the release of Centos-3.3 was so popular, that it threw us way over the threshold of our ISP's, and now we are stuck with a _very_ large bill (as in an estimated 6TB of transfers). While in one hand I am ecstatic that we are so successful, but on the other hand, that is coming out of the developers pockets. The developers should be the last ones footing these bills (and this

Hi llvm-devels, there is a very simple using case concerning LLVM and I am wondering whether it might be optimized at LLVM layer: //----------- int rec_func(int x, int y) { if(y<0) return x; return y + rec_func(x, y-1); // should we really push x? } void main() { rec_func(1, 1000); rec_func(2, 2000); } //----------- Guys, don't focus on a stupid mathematics beyond this function

alan said: > I think I am in agreement, > if by "isn't necessary" you mean to say that > simply providing more features to Markdown > doesn't force end users to use them, > or even really know they exist. except that wasn't what i meant. i mean that it's not necessary to trade simplicity in order to get the power of additional

...-|@DIALOG_EX_CONTEXTHELP@|Under Windows, puts a query button on thecaption. When pressed, Windows will go into a context-sensitive help mode and Widgets will senda EVT_HELP event if the user clicked on an application window. _Note_\ that this is an extendedstyle and must be set by calling "set_extra_style":#Dialog_setextrastyle before Create is called (two-step construction).| </del><ins>+|@DIALOG_NO_PARENT@|By default, a dialog created with a @nil@ parent window will be given the "application''s top level window":app.html as parent. Use thisstyle to prevent t...