search for: _added_

...I made was to change valid users for the shares accounts and finsvcs to %U from %G. The documentation says that %G is the _primary_ group of the user in question; the primary group of these users, from the way they were first entered into the system is 'users;' they were only after that _added_ to the groups owning the shares' directories. Could this be part of problem, or is that a non-distinction? Also, what am I doing to security by allowing the session user in and not mandating that that person be a member of the share-owning group? Thanks Eric Hines There is no nonsense...

Hi, I have a microarray dataset from Agilent chips. The data were really log ratio between test samples and a universal reference RNA. Because of the nature of log ratios, coefficient of variation (CV) doesn't really apply to this kind of data due to the fact that mean of log ratio is very close to 0. What kind of measurements would people use to measure the dispersion so that I can compare

> > _ target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX.CFG > > I don't think that exists? (see list below) In our "first test" (simple boot prompt), we created "target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX.CFG". In our "second test" we _added_ "target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX/EFI64/SYSLX64.CFG". Part of my intention was to test whether it actually reaches one cfg or the other. Although there are special circumstances in which the first one could still be useful, I don't want to leave it there while troubleshooting. Since you...

On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 12:32 PM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > > When booting in UEFI x64 mode in your next test, you should see a boot > > > menu. > > > > Nope: > > > > *** Press enter to boot the default label *** > > Failed to load libcom32.c32 > > Failed to load COM32 file SYSLINUX/EFI64/vesamenu.c32 >

....com> wrote: > > > > > _ target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX.CFG > > > > I don't think that exists? (see list below) > > > In our "first test" (simple boot prompt), we created > "target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX.CFG". In our "second test" we _added_ > "target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX/EFI64/SYSLX64.CFG". Part of my intention was > to test whether it actually reaches one cfg or the other. Although > there are special circumstances in which the first one could still be > useful, I don't want to leave it there while troubleshoot...