search for: 9c410552

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "9c410552".

Did you mean: 11410552
2017 Sep 09
0
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
Well, that makes me feel better. I've seen all these stories here and on Ovirt recently about VMs going read-only, even on fairly simply layouts. Each time, I've responded that we just don't see those issues. I guess the fact that we were lazy about switching to gfapi turns out to be a potential explanation <grin> -wk On 9/9/2017 6:49 AM, Pavel Szalbot wrote: >
2017 Sep 09
2
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
Yes, this is my observation so far. On Sep 9, 2017 13:32, "Gionatan Danti" <g.danti at assyoma.it> wrote: > Il 09-09-2017 09:09 Pavel Szalbot ha scritto: > >> Sorry, I did not start the glusterfsd on the node I was shutting >> yesterday and now killed another one during FUSE test, so it had to >> crash immediately (only one of three nodes were actually
2017 Sep 09
2
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
.../lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170909/9c410552/attachment.sig>