Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "9c410552".
Did you mean:
11410552
2017 Sep 09
0
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
Well, that makes me feel better.
I've seen all these stories here and on Ovirt recently about VMs going
read-only, even on fairly simply layouts.
Each time, I've responded that we just don't see those issues.
I guess the fact that we were lazy about switching to gfapi turns out to
be a potential explanation <grin>
-wk
On 9/9/2017 6:49 AM, Pavel Szalbot wrote:
>
2017 Sep 09
2
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
Yes, this is my observation so far.
On Sep 9, 2017 13:32, "Gionatan Danti" <g.danti at assyoma.it> wrote:
> Il 09-09-2017 09:09 Pavel Szalbot ha scritto:
>
>> Sorry, I did not start the glusterfsd on the node I was shutting
>> yesterday and now killed another one during FUSE test, so it had to
>> crash immediately (only one of three nodes were actually
2017 Sep 09
2
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
.../lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170909/9c410552/attachment.sig>