search for: 82547ei

Does anyone know if support for the Intel 875P/ICH5 motherboard chipset has yet made it into the stable branch? (Is release 4.9 likely to have it?) I am mainly interested in the IDE and "native" serial ATA devices. There is also a new Intel ethernet controller chip, 82547EI, that is designed to interface directly with the 875P chip. The currently supported chip list only goes up to the 82546. Is there a current version of the supported hardware notes for the freebsd-stable branch? Dan Strick strick@covad.net

...llel ATA ports - ICH5R 2 parallel ATA ports - ITE 8212 raid chip attached to ICH5R 2 serial ATA ports - ICH5R 2 serial ATA ports - Sil3112 raid chip attached to ICH5R 8 USB 2.0 ports - ICH5R 3 firewire ports - TI TSB43AB23 chip attached to ICH5R gigabit ethernet - Intel 82547EI chip attached to 875P audio - Realtek ALC655 CODEC attached to ICH5R Note: the Intel 82547EI chip is rather common on 875P motherboards because it is one of the very few ethernet controllers that can attach directly to the 875P chip. The two raid chips and the audio chip may be less common....

I have a router with 3 network interfaces like in the following ASCII diagram below. All interfaces are 100mbit. There is tcp traffic being sent from net1 to net3 and from net2 to net3 and the tcp connections consume as much bandwidth as possible. There is a pfifo queue on the egress interface eth0 of the core router with a limit of 10 packets. net1 --> (eth1) router (eth0) -> net3

Hi, I noticed that network connection of one of my boxes got significantly slow just after upgrading it to 8.0R. The box has an em0 (82547EI) and worked fine with 7.2R. The symptoms are: - A ping to a host on the same LAN takes 990ms RTT, it reduces gradually to around 1ms, and then it returns to around 1s. The rate was about 2ms/ping. - The response is quite slow, but no packet loss and network services on the box seem...

Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*): (In short, see *** below) Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI Desktop adapter MT) connected directly without a switch/hub and "device polling" compiled into a custom kernel with HZ set to 256 and kern.polling.enabled set to "1": LOCAL: (/samsung is ufs2 on /dev/ad4p1, a SAMSUNG SP080N2) test3:~#7: dd if=/dev/zero of=/samsun...