search for: 800kb

...of the nature of this library and thumbnails take to much time to load it seems as though it is actually loading the entire image to then display the small thumbnail. Is this true? Also isnt there some kind of caching that can be activated? Anything to increase this speed. Each image weights about 800kb, and the user is sitting on a 1mbit line but it takes several seconds for each image. Simply not the best experience. Thanks Mark

[Please Cc: timball@tux.org on replies because I'm not on the samba list] Setup: Samba 2.0.7 (from debian sid), Linux 2.4.3-XFS, Window95, Windows98 Problem: I have a linux machine that I occationally duel boot and I wanted to be able to share my mp3s directory to my roomate via samba. I figured I'd just make a partition vfat and have both linux and windows export that directory... but

The user''s list has controls on the size of posts that it will accept without moderation. This is done so that the entire list isn''t spammed with 800kb trace files or hi-rez diagrams of someone''s network. When a post exceeds the limit (currently 120kb), the moderator receives a message. It is then necessary to log onto the list server and to either approve or reject the post. Often in the case of "shorewall start" failure repor...

...ile, but occasionally one of the Windows machines would save a corrupted file to the server... This mainly happened with a Windows 3D rendering program I use, which periodically saves 1MB image files on the Samba share. About 1 out of 10 of these files got "cut off", i.e. only the first 0-800KB were actually stored. I'm not even 100% sure this is a Samba problem, but I stopped seeing these corrupted short files when I returned to Samba 2.0.7. The Samba share is just a plain old Linux ext2 partition, and the server is running kernel 2.4.9-ac10. I don't have an urgent need to use...

...ed and can be only unlocked by means of a reboot of the system. I could verify details on the problem by running NAI sniffer at my workstation while making the problem happen. It's reproductible 100% of times I try to do it and it happens in the following conditions: 1) I open the file (a ~800KB Power Point presentation) from a local disk and I save it on the network. The sniffer shows me that everything goes all right, sending SMB commands to open and close files. I notice that NBT data blocks are sized 1460 bytes, and the window size of the TCP connection is 8760 bytes. 2) When I try t...

I am using Asterisk and A2billing Calling Card Platform and after the 6th call the quality starts to degrade. The way it set up is the user calls into the system then dial out so I have 12 channels being used up but 6 active calls. Here are my specs Asterisk SVN-branch-1.4-r79142 on a i686 running Linux Fedora 6, Pentium 4 Hyper-Threading, 64 bit, 1GB of RAM, 80 GB Sata Drive, bandwidth 4 Mbps

Hello, We have long running problem with NetApp filers. When we connect server to the filer sequential read performance is ~70MB/s. But once we run database on the server seq read performance drops to ~11MB/s. That's happening with two servers. One is running Oracle another - MySQL. During speed tests database load is very light (less than 1MB/s of reads and writes). During the tests NetApp

I set up a domU as a backup server, but it has very, very poor network performance with external computers. I ran some tests with iperf and found some very weird results. Using iperf, I get these approximate numbers (the left column is the iperf client and the right column is the iperf server): domU --> domU 1.77 Gbits/sec (using 127.0.0.1) domU --> domU 1.85 Gbits/sec (using domU

I set up a domU as a backup server, but it has very, very poor network performance with external computers. I ran some tests with iperf and found some very weird results. Using iperf, I get these approximate numbers (the left column is the iperf client and the right column is the iperf server): domU --> domU 1.77 Gbits/sec (using 127.0.0.1) domU --> domU 1.85 Gbits/sec (using domU

Server : eth0 - internet DSL eth1 - LAN wlan0 - wireles LAN I want server to share bandwith from eth0 evenly for users on eth1 and wlan0. How can i make it ? Is it possible ? As far as i know htb splits outgoing bandwith on one device only. ---------------------------------------------------- Grypa? Damy radę! Sprawdź jak jej zapowbiegać, a jeśli już za późno ...jak leczyć - grypa.wp.pl

Icecast 2.0 and Ices 2.0 are both fairly usable now. I have set up a semi-permanent test stream for people to bang on at: http://i.cantcode.com:8888/ices.ogg Please report any problems you have. I say semi-permanent, because it will probably crash now and then, and I will be developing and putting up the new versions on a regular basis. If it stops working for more than an hour, somethings

Icecast 2.0 and Ices 2.0 are both fairly usable now. I have set up a semi-permanent test stream for people to bang on at: http://i.cantcode.com:8888/ices.ogg Please report any problems you have. I say semi-permanent, because it will probably crash now and then, and I will be developing and putting up the new versions on a regular basis. If it stops working for more than an hour, somethings

Hi all. I know this has probably been asked before, but I need a quick answer, and didn't find anything on the net. Has anyone done any benchmark comparisons of server speed from Win95 clients, accessing files on a Samba 1.9.17p1 server share, as compared to an NT Server, running on the same server hardware? If so, how did Samba 1.9.17 measure up to the NT server? I need an answer to this,

...mbd is transmitting in 64K chunks, but > > only one chunk per second. > > > > If I have a telnet (ssh) window open from the windows machine with stuff > > happening in the window, like a ls -lR, throughput increases dramatically > > from the 64 KB/sec to something like 800KB/sec (this is 10-base-2). > > > > It's as if samba can only transmit one tcp packet per second unless > > something else transmits a packet. What could cause this? > > A fix was put in for this into Samba 2.2.1 (and 2.2.1a). > Discussions of this are archived on samba...

...ng log files and tcpdump results, it looks like smbd is transmitting in 64K chunks, but only one chunk per second. If I have a telnet (ssh) window open from the windows machine with stuff happening in the window, like a ls -lR, throughput increases dramatically from the 64 KB/sec to something like 800KB/sec (this is 10-base-2). It's as if samba can only transmit one tcp packet per second unless something else transmits a packet. What could cause this? Please respond to this email address; I'm not subscribed to this list. Thank you. I'm running on NetBSD 1.5, with the following smb...