search for: 64th

..."predict" ahead into the > un-encoded input stream. Compare against the actual input, and end the > block where residual starts to show up. Hmm, looks interesting for me. But i would rather use usual lpc with order like 8 or so (your example -- i think residual will show up just by 64th sample in most cases), and watch residual size for extrapolated samples. What about something like this: * compute lpc for small block (as you say, 64 samples for example) * watch residual size for extrapolated samples by the block, in sample where starts significant changes, mark begin of a new...

David, The problem with the sparse representation is that it is word-width dependent. For 32-bit data-types, the mask is the 32nd bit, while fore 64bit types the mask is the 64th bit. How would you legalize the mask for the following code ? %mask = cmp nge <4 x float> %A, %B ; <4 x i1> %val = select <4 x i1>% mask, <4 x double> %X, %Y ; <4 x double> Moreover, in some cases the generator of the mask and the consumer of th...

I'm spinning up a guest, using virt-install. i'm passing the guest a single vcpu and many network interfaces. On the guest side all the interfaces are initially in the down state. I've notice then when I manually bring a specific one of these interfaces up (eg the 64th interface), the guest system hangs. Doing an "strace ifconfig etX up", it looks like the system hangs when doing the ioctl to bring the interface up. This guest is 18.04. Host is 16.04. Are there any qemu/virt commands i can run from the host which would provide me a better understand...

...ROOT data 1.94T 945G 1.02T 47% ONLINE - root# zfs data NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT data 945G 1014G 945G /sasuser v As you can see a 2TB lun has been reported as 1.94T. I have seen an article on the dsl_pool.c which shows that zfs takes 1/64th of the disk size as reserve for better allocation. However even that does not explain this much loss of space in reporting. Warm Regards Sharad Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or &qu...

...ngs - I had to use the opensuse 11.3 repos for a version of openssh that works with unison. (several people on the forums have reported this bug, but I did not see it in bugzilla). best bm ____________________________ Professor W. Bentley MacLeod Visiting Scholar Russell Sage Foundation 112 East 64th Street ? New York, NY 10065 http://www.columbia.edu/~wbm2103/ ____________________________

...the > > un-encoded input stream. Compare against the actual input, and end the > > block where residual starts to show up. > > Hmm, looks interesting for me. But i would rather use usual lpc with > order like 8 or so (your example -- i think residual will show up just > by 64th sample in most cases), and watch residual size for extrapolated > samples. What about something like this: > > * compute lpc for small block (as you say, 64 samples for example) > * watch residual size for extrapolated samples by the block, in sample > where starts significant cha...

...page-order? Surely we can think of a few ways... A bitmap is 64x more dense if the lists are unordered. It means being able to store ~32k*2M=64G worth of 2M pages in one data page vs. ~1G. That's 64x fewer cachelines to touch, 64x fewer pages to move to the hypervisor and lets us allocate 1/64th the memory. Given a maximum allocation that we're allowed, it lets us do 64x more per-pass. Now, are those benefits worth it? Maybe not, but let's not pretend they don't exist. ;) >> If that was purely a length, we'd be limited to 64*4k pages per entry, >> which isn&...

...page-order? Surely we can think of a few ways... A bitmap is 64x more dense if the lists are unordered. It means being able to store ~32k*2M=64G worth of 2M pages in one data page vs. ~1G. That's 64x fewer cachelines to touch, 64x fewer pages to move to the hypervisor and lets us allocate 1/64th the memory. Given a maximum allocation that we're allowed, it lets us do 64x more per-pass. Now, are those benefits worth it? Maybe not, but let's not pretend they don't exist. ;) >> If that was purely a length, we'd be limited to 64*4k pages per entry, >> which isn&...

"Rotem, Nadav" <nadav.rotem at intel.com> writes: > One of the arguments for packing masks is that it reduces > vector-registers pressure. Auto-vectorizing compilers maintain > multiple masks for different execution paths (for each loop nesting, > etc). Saving masks in xmm registers may result in vector-register > pressure which will cause spilling of these

...an think of a few ways... > > A bitmap is 64x more dense if the lists are unordered. It means being > able to store ~32k*2M=64G worth of 2M pages in one data page vs. ~1G. > That's 64x fewer cachelines to touch, 64x fewer pages to move to the > hypervisor and lets us allocate 1/64th the memory. Given a maximum > allocation that we're allowed, it lets us do 64x more per-pass. > > Now, are those benefits worth it? Maybe not, but let's not pretend they > don't exist. ;) In the best case there are benefits obviously, the question is how common the best...

The following commands z <- matrix(seq(0, 1, len=1000)) image(z, 1, z, zlim=c(0, 1), col=gray(1:10/10)) appear to violate the image functionality as described on the help page. As I understand it, by specifying a zlim of c(0, 1) and a colour vector of length 10, the colours should correspond to the intervals (0, 0.1), (0.1, 0.2), ..., (0.9, 1.0), this being 10 equally-spaced intervals on (0,

On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 12:26:12PM -0400, Hod McWuff wrote: > On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 03:19, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:57:03PM -0400, Hod McWuff wrote: > > > Agreed that the oversampling isn't useful in the long term. I'm not sure > > > what you mean by 'dictioniary overhead'. > > > > > > I'd like to see

Hi David, The MOVMSKPS instruction is cheap (2 cycles). Not to be confused with VMASKMOV, the AVX masked move, which is expensive. One of the arguments for packing masks is that it reduces vector-registers pressure. Auto-vectorizing compilers maintain multiple masks for different execution paths (for each loop nesting, etc). Saving masks in xmm registers may result in vector-register

Removing silly virtio-dev@ list because it's bouncing mail... On 12/07/2016 08:21 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Li's current patches do that. Well, maybe not pfn/length, but they do >> take a pfn and page-order, which fits perfectly with the kernel's >> concept of high-order pages. > > So we can send length in powers of two. Still, I don't see any

Removing silly virtio-dev@ list because it's bouncing mail... On 12/07/2016 08:21 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Li's current patches do that. Well, maybe not pfn/length, but they do >> take a pfn and page-order, which fits perfectly with the kernel's >> concept of high-order pages. > > So we can send length in powers of two. Still, I don't see any

...re not the "amount" (Nx255x63), but the "position" (or "name", if you want). So for a geometry of Nx255x63, 1st sector: CHS: 0 / 0 / 1 = LBA 0 2nd: CHS: 0 / 0 / 2 = LBA 1 61th: CHS: 0 / 0 / 61 = LBA 60 62th: CHS: 0 / 0 / 62 = LBA 61 63th: CHS: 0 / 0 / 63 = LBA 62 64th: CHS: 0 / 1 / 1 = LBA 63 65th: CHS: 0 / 1 / 2 = LBA 64 126th: CHS: 0 / 1 / 63 = LBA 125 127th: CHS: 0 / 2 / 1 = LBA 126 189th: CHS: 0 / 2 / 63= LBA 188 16065th: CHS: 0 / 254 / 63= LBA 16064 16066th: CHS: 1 / 0 / 1= LBA 16065 32130th: CHS: 1 / 254 / 63= LBA 32129 32131th: CHS: 2 / 0 / 1= LB...

Hi, I wanted to create a new btrfs fs for my backups. When trying to mkfs.btrfs for that device, I''m getting "error checking /dev/loop2 mount status" With strace I see where the problem is: lstat("/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-par", 0x7fffa30b3cf0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) The problem is there is something missing

As I said before, booting is bigger than one bootloader. I am replying to what I think was asked. I might have misunderstood the questions. Whichever the case, this email is less about Syslinux itself. If this is considered too far off-topic in the Syslinux Mailing List, please receive my apologies. > > I still have the factory-set contents of my three USB sticks. A small