search for: 62g

...file '/tmp/MYL4qeT5' (Errcode: 28) SQL: , , select * from tips order by rand() limit 0, 1 , According to google search, errorcode 28 means the HDD is full. But it isn't: root at vps:[~]$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 84G 18G 62G 23% / none 640M 0 640M 0% /dev/shm /usr/tmpDSK 485M 11M 449M 3% /tmp What else could cause this kind of problem? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Hosting Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532

...Ahlers <Rudi at softdux.com> wrote: >> According to google search, errorcode 28 means the HDD is full. But it >> isn't: >> >> >> root at vps:[~]$ df -h >> Filesystem ? ? ? ? ? ?Size ?Used Avail Use% Mounted on >> /dev/sda1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ?84G ? 18G ? 62G ?23% / >> none ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?640M ? ? 0 ?640M ? 0% /dev/shm >> /usr/tmpDSK ? ? ? ? ? 485M ? 11M ?449M ? 3% /tmp >> >> >> What else could cause this kind of problem? > > You only have 449MB free on /tmp. It could easily fill that up during the > query, and t...

...ps. A df -h shows the following: [root at imsthdb07 ~]# df -h /data/orabackup Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/eva_mpio_myserver07_08_oracle_bkup0 250G 198G 53G 79% /data/orabackup While a du -sh shows that 62G is used I read Sunil Mushran's article on the reported differences between df & du and that sort of makes sense (maybe I'm missing something). The filesystem was created with a Blocksize and Clustersize of 4Kb and is mounted with the following parameters: /dev/mapper/eva_mpio_my...

...ch file or directory du: cannot access ?/proc/21489/task/21489/fdinfo/4?: No such file or directory du: cannot access ?/proc/21489/fd/4?: No such file or directory du: cannot access ?/proc/21489/fdinfo/4?: No such file or directory 0 /proc 6.1M /root 857M /run 0 /sbin 0 /srv 0 /sys 0 /tmp 2.8G /usr 62G /var # du -sh /var/* 0 /var/adm 89M /var/cache 0 /var/crash 8.0K /var/db 0 /var/empty 0 /var/games 0 /var/gopher 0 /var/kerberos 16G /var/lib 0 /var/local 0 /var/lock 47G /var/log 0 /var/mail 0 /var/nis 0 /var/opt 0 /var/preserve 0 /var/run 98M /var/spool 0 /var/tmp 499M /var/www 0 /var/yp How c...

Well, for reference, here's what I'm running: The mirror is running Solaris 8, the source is running Solaris 7. Both are running the same version of rsync: rsync version 2.5.4 protocol version 26 Copyright (C) 1996-2002 by Andrew Tridgell and others <http://rsync.samba.org/> Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, batchfiles, no IPv6, 64-bit

...n-3.4.gz         module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.30-rc6-tip root=/dev/mapper/VolGroup-lv_root ro console=tty0         module /boot/initrd-2.6.30-rc6-tip.img [root@localhost boot]# df -h Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup-lv_root                        77G   11G   62G  15% / /dev/sda7             194M   37M  148M  20% /boot tmpfs                1002M  672K 1002M   1% /dev/shm [root@localhost boot]# ll total 30922 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root   97799 2009-05-28 03:39 config-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE -rw-r--r--. 1 root root   97469 2009-08-15 11:20 config-2.6.29.6-217...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking