Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "4ec".
Did you mean:
4c
2017 Sep 06
2
3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss
Hi,
Just do some ingestion tests to 40 node 16+4EC 19PB single volume.
100 clients are writing each has 5 threads total 500 threads.
With 3.10.5 each server has 800MB/s network traffic, cluster total is 32GB/s
With 3.12.0 each server has 200MB/s network traffic, cluster total is 8GB/s
I did not change any volume options in both configs.
Any though...
2017 Sep 06
0
3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss
On 09/06/2017 05:48 AM, Serkan ?oban wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just do some ingestion tests to 40 node 16+4EC 19PB single volume.
> 100 clients are writing each has 5 threads total 500 threads.
> With 3.10.5 each server has 800MB/s network traffic, cluster total is 32GB/s
> With 3.12.0 each server has 200MB/s network traffic, cluster total is 8GB/s
> I did not change any volume options in both...
2017 Sep 07
2
3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss
...sequential write with file size 2GB. Same behavior observed with
3.11.3 too.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/06/2017 05:48 AM, Serkan ?oban wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just do some ingestion tests to 40 node 16+4EC 19PB single volume.
>> 100 clients are writing each has 5 threads total 500 threads.
>> With 3.10.5 each server has 800MB/s network traffic, cluster total is
>> 32GB/s
>> With 3.12.0 each server has 200MB/s network traffic, cluster total is
>> 8GB/s
>> I did not...
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...jae 4eb <__FUNCTION__.21966+0xb>
> + 486: 73 63 jae 4eb <__FUNCTION__.21879+0xb>
> 488: 61 popa
> 489: 6c insb (%dx),%es:(%edi)
> 48a: 61 popa
> - 48b: 72 5f jb 4ec <__FUNCTION__.21966+0xc>
> + 48b: 72 5f jb 4ec <__FUNCTION__.21879+0xc>
> 48d: 61 popa
> 48e: 6e outsb %ds:(%esi),(%dx)
> 48f: 64 fs
> 490: 5f pop %edi
> - 491:...
2017 Sep 11
0
3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss
...B. Same behavior observed with
> 3.11.3 too.
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 09/06/2017 05:48 AM, Serkan ?oban wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just do some ingestion tests to 40 node 16+4EC 19PB single volume.
>>> 100 clients are writing each has 5 threads total 500 threads.
>>> With 3.10.5 each server has 800MB/s network traffic, cluster total is
>>> 32GB/s
>>> With 3.12.0 each server has 200MB/s network traffic, cluster total is
>>> 8GB/s...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
...z%5Rh-^$%hSZn1*zvjP(eZb1S5XZoO^N9sv0sXvTKm1>asBLz~)kSf)p#ibg`KjHFz
zD1W77deP6Xl#;Xz7myktkoZAN;uY$7r9k43St1t_C90GtQ6YiR(5m%_{E!)vFlV&k
zZ0Vn{rSCb}Xf|QWwMJdTm4bRDzh03xrwrUpAE(4D{?oX4DU1IoE?$}tFMV6QrI+}h
z#Ts14(gmuToboq3+`roynW06q(lB?B7SGTM>a_ei9M<ZTXcpvR3U5>XZQ|xfzFQ8V
zHVk#R<I9oD%4eC$LbT;SwE&)30{t9CCp#7#?qxw?%z_0fEckJ63x+9<1xSmBDKQHc
zsQ-@^KoEn=vEX1Y3nDQK&an>$vj;zvImdy8K#I at BUFcZhXxY(A%aE9s^Q>iPOw0M0
z79hpvzfjB0URwS<rsXDk<0m|vI21osq8RARP{a-zgb{WVt+}a29w|On9~q|g)B^-l
zy3J?xjPNLX0mJ;cRmS5E*bA#HG2;J%4b8!TiMsam_@=#=J;m|iRm%qbrQ%9XiE#J)
zN~c+34Amf3tF}g7TFsgK...