search for: 450k

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "450k".

Did you mean: 450
2014 Jul 12
0
lm and 450k data
Hi, I'm quite new to R and currently trying to use lm to fit linear models but I am currently stuck my code is as follows: Model1 = function(meth_matrix,exposure, X1, X2, X3, batch) { mod = lm(meth_matrix[, methcol]~exposure+X1+X2+X3+batch) res = summary(mod)$coef[2,] system.time(indiv.results <- mclapply(setNames(ncol=473864(cord_betas)), dimnames(cord_betas)[[2]]), Model1,
2005 Apr 07
5
question about correct way of shapping
...affic-Control-HOWTO/ http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/DS-21.htm and a wonderful figure from: http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/ds-lb-214.gif I have a newbie question. Suposse next figure: <--- up 128K internet ----- dsl ---------------------eth1 -Linux Qos- eth0 ------ LAN ---> down 450k If I want "shape" traffic to my LAN ( sharing equally download for all users) I have to insert a rule like this tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 htb tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 400kbit and ....other rules and If I want "shape" traffic to Inter...
2006 May 10
11
HTB at 100+ Mbits/sec
Hello all, I''ve been trying to test HTB performance for different link bandwidths to find potential limits and this is what I have so far: http://home.comcast.net/~msethuraman/htbtest/ Can members please go over the setup, test procedure and the results and answer a few questions? 1. Is the testing methodology okay and can the results be considered accurate? If so, is this a decent
2006 Oct 13
3
Ferret 0.10.11 & AAF: sorting Time fields doesn''t work
Ferret 0.10.11 & AAF: the time seems to be stored in a format that can''t be sorted, the order doesn''t make any sense. Workaround: use to_i on the Time object before putting it into the index. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2009 Aug 09
2
alternate compression
On Aug 8, 2009, at 23:11, Didier Dambrin wrote: > Electronic music quite often doesn't leave a computer these days. > And it > mainly consists of drums, synths & vocals/effects. Drums are often > samples > sequenced at sample (not sub-sample) accuracy, thus repeated (of > course if > the song was post-resampled, there will be sub-sample times). Good point. I
2000 Feb 09
0
FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE/samba 2.0.6 problems
...c, and declines rapidly to a maximum of about 500K/sec. The effect of different buffer sizes is as follows: Size Speed in K/sec, 32MB file of SO_[RCV,SND]BUF Written by TESTNET, 500 65K blocks 16384 50K/sec (3.4-STABLE) 32768 97K/sec (3.4-STABLE) 65535 450K/sec (3.4-STABLE) 131072 410K/sec (3.4-STABLE) 262144 1980K/sec (3.3-RELEASE)
2009 Aug 10
0
alternate compression
...). ..so I started OGGing a song at various bitrates, subtracted it from the original, and tried encoding the residual using the lossless packers I mentioned. To my surprise, the size of the OGG+the packed residual always roughly matched the size of the packed original. Tried with 32k, 128k & 450k oggs.. always the same! Not exactly the same of course, but I was expecting much bigger results (not really smaller, assuming someone had tried the same before me). (haven't tried with MP3, but it's probably worse) The residual from the OGG seemed to be very stable in gain, with a bit d...
2010 Jul 27
2
Installing the Zoo Library.
Hi Ya'll I'm trying to install the zoo library... I've downloaded about 5 or 6 of their releases (inc. the latest one), all of them giving me the same syntax error when trying to install... Anyone seen this problem before? its not the "lib" argument that is the problem (ive been installing other packages using this exact format with no problem... just zoo is the problem.
2009 Aug 21
5
httpd - mysql - paypal.com.tar - hacker
....79M 2s 250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 47% 323K 1s 300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 55% 1.80M 1s 350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 63% 1.76M 1s 400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 71% 431K 1s 450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 79% 1.77M 0s 500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 87% 1.75M 0s 550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 95% 1.82M 0s 600K .......... .......... .......... 100% 1.87M=1.6s 00:21:16 (...
2005 Jun 22
5
network (NAT?) problem
Hello, my current network setup looks like the following: dom2-eth0 (172.30.1.22) netmask /24 | | xen-br1 (no ip) | dom1-eth0 (172.30.1.21) netmask /24 dom1-eth1 (172.30.0.21) netmask /24 | | xen-br10 (172.30.0.1) netmask /24 | dom0 | | xen-br0 (normal IP) | eth0 (same IP as xen-br0) |