search for: 362mb

...ses' so that read.csv does not have to guess at the types. You will probably need more memory depending on the type of data. If I assume that it is numeric and that it takes about 6 characters to specify a number, then you have approximately 45M numbers in the file and this will take up 362MB for a single object. You should have at least 3X the size of the largest object to do any processing since copies will have to be made. I would suggest partitioning the file and processing in parts. You can also put it in a database and 'sample' the rows that you want to process....

...ses' so that read.csv does not have to guess at the types. You will probably need more memory depending on the type of data. If I assume that it is numeric and that it takes about 6 characters to specify a number, then you have approximately 45M numbers in the file and this will take up 362MB for a single object. You should have at least 3X the size of the largest object to do any processing since copies will have to be made. I would suggest partitioning the file and processing in parts. You can also put it in a database and 'sample' the rows that you want to process....

...ses' so that read.csv does not have to guess at the types. You will probably need more memory depending on the type of data. If I assume that it is numeric and that it takes about 6 characters to specify a number, then you have approximately 45M numbers in the file and this will take up 362MB for a single object. You should have at least 3X the size of the largest object to do any processing since copies will have to be made. I would suggest partitioning the file and processing in parts. You can also put it in a database and 'sample' the rows that you want to process....

...ses' so that read.csv does not have to guess at the types. You will probably need more memory depending on the type of data. If I assume that it is numeric and that it takes about 6 characters to specify a number, then you have approximately 45M numbers in the file and this will take up 362MB for a single object. You should have at least 3X the size of the largest object to do any processing since copies will have to be made. I would suggest partitioning the file and processing in parts. You can also put it in a database and 'sample' the rows that you want to process....