Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "1ccd96ef".
2018 Mar 20
0
Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
Hi Raghavendra,
> On 20 Mar 2018, at 1:55 pm, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Aggregating large number of small writes by write-behind into large writes has been merged on master:
> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/364 <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/364>
>
> Would like to know whether it helps for this usecase.
2018 Mar 20
2
Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:55 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote:
> On 3/19/2018 10:52 AM, Rik Theys wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03/19/2018 03:42 PM, TomK wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
>>> Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my
>>> own setup either. For the writes
2018 Mar 20
2
Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
...ttps://twitter.com/s_mcleod
>
> Words are my own opinions and do not necessarily represent those of
> my employer or partners.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180320/1ccd96ef/attachment.html>