Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "1c88dea4".
2006 Dec 06
0
[LLVMdev] Proposed: first class packed structures
Attached is a cleaned up patch.
Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: packed.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 12700 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20061206/26110f77/attachment.bin>
2006 Dec 06
3
[LLVMdev] Proposed: first class packed structures
...requires llvm_extra.patch, not included in the previous emails.
Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: llvm_extra.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1677 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20061206/1c88dea4/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gcc.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2714 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20061206/1c88dea4/attachment-0001.bin>
2006 Dec 06
4
[LLVMdev] Proposed: first class packed structures
Currently, Structure layout is left to targets, which implement them
according to the ABI of that platform. While this is fine for most
structures, it makes packed structures very ugly. All fields in a
packed type must be converted to byte arrays with casts to access
fields, which bloats accesses and obsfucates the types. First class
support for packed types would clean up the generated code