Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "141m".
Did you mean:
141
2017 Apr 22
5
Git Transition status?
...t LLVM libraries and everything else being in separate repos.
I agree fully. I work on a project that use submodules for external
dependencies. For llvm this means compiling and linking statically
with dependencies for Linux and OSX platforms. So these:
(compiler-rt, libcxx, libcxxabi, libunwind) 141M (.git 60M)
I would hesitate to add a dependency that use 1.5G disk space, so if
you go with the mono-repo approach I would probably use the supposed
read only mirror repos for these modules.
This in turn would mean that the hurdle for contributing back to these
projects would increase and thus t...
2018 Apr 27
3
Size of produced binaries when compiling llvm & clang sources
...c
452M clang-include-fixer
444M modularize
443M clang-func-mapping
442M clang-diff
441M libToolingExample00
438M pp-trace
434M diagtool
184M llvm-cfi-verify
170M llvm-objdump
168M sancov
158M llvm-rtdyld
149M llvm-ar
148M llvm-nm
145M llvm-extract
145M llvm-link
142M llvm-dwarfdump
141M llvm-split
131M llvm-mc
127M llvm-pdbutil
126M clang-offload-bundler
122M llvm-mca
121M verify-uselistorder
121M llvm-cat
120M llvm-as
117M llvm-special-case-list-fuzzer
117M llvm-demangle-fuzzer
116M llvm-modextract
114M obj2yaml
112M llvm-xray
105M sanstats
105M llvm-symbolizer
96...
2018 Apr 27
0
Size of produced binaries when compiling llvm & clang sources
...> 442M clang-diff
> 441M libToolingExample00
> 438M pp-trace
> 434M diagtool
> 184M llvm-cfi-verify
> 170M llvm-objdump
> 168M sancov
> 158M llvm-rtdyld
> 149M llvm-ar
> 148M llvm-nm
> 145M llvm-extract
> 145M llvm-link
> 142M llvm-dwarfdump
> 141M llvm-split
> 131M llvm-mc
> 127M llvm-pdbutil
> 126M clang-offload-bundler
> 122M llvm-mca
> 121M verify-uselistorder
> 121M llvm-cat
> 120M llvm-as
> 117M llvm-special-case-list-fuzzer
> 117M llvm-demangle-fuzzer
> 116M llvm-modextract
> 114M obj2yaml
&g...
2016 Jan 21
1
snat packet going out a bridge
...are empty.
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 359K packets, 136M bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 55801 packets, 4736K bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 319K packets, 141M bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
--
Stephen Clark
2011 Feb 05
0
40MB repaired on a disk during scrub but no errors
...vant, this is a 6 drive mirrored pool with a single SSD for L2Arc cache. Pool version 26 under Nexenta Core Platform 3.0 with a LSI 9200-16E and SATA disks.
$ zpool status bigboy
pool: bigboy
state: ONLINE
scan: scrub in progress since Sat Feb 5 02:22:18 2011
3.74T scanned out of 3.74T at 141M/s, 0h0m to go
37.9M repaired, 99.88% done
[-----config snip - all columns 0, one drive on the right has "(repairing)"----]
errors: No known data errors
And then once the scrub completes:
$ zpool status bigboy
pool: bigboy
state: ONLINE
scan: scrub repaired 37.9M in 7h42m with 0...
2016 Jan 20
3
snat packet going out a bridge
Hi List,
I am running into a problem where I have 2 interfaces bridged with and ip address assigned.
I have another interface in which traffic has ingress traffic that needs to go out the bridged interface.
I am trying unsuccessfully to SNAT the traffic leaving the bridge interface to its assigned address.
# brctl show xbrdg0
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
2019 Aug 30
9
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 is here
Hello everyone,
9.0.0-rc3 was tagged today from the release_90 branch at r370450. In
the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3.
Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc3
Binaries will be added as they become available.
There are currently no open release blockers, which means if nothing
new comes up, the final release could ship soon and this is
2017 Jan 17
5
Git Transition status?
On Jan 13, 2017, at 1:37 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> The main outcome of the BoF had the dev meeting was that we agreeād that moving to GitHub was the best choice forward for LLVM (IIRC only one person in the room expressed concerned about GitHub, but he said he had personal grief with them and nothing specific for LLVM).
>
> The unknown that
2006 May 19
25
iptables CLASSIFY and MARK not working?
I have to match my packets based on MAC address, which I cannot do in
the POSTROUTING chain, so I do it in PREROUTING using MARK. Then, I
match on the MARK in the POSTROUTING chain to do a CLASSIFY. But this
does not seem to work:
wireless-r1 bwlimit # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3353K packets, 941M bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source