> "Soulfly" <zob_soulfly@hotmail.com> thus wrote:
>
> > tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 5 priomap 2 3 2 2 3 3
3
3 1
> > 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
> > tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 10
> > tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 20: sfq perturb 10
> > tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:3 handle 30: sfq perturb 10
> > tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:4 handle 40: sfq perturb 10
> > tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1: prio 10 u32 match ip
protocol
> > 0xXX 0xff flowid 1:1
>

I have a configuration which use 5 prio levels (2 above the standard
priolevels). I conerted it to 4 and forgot to alter the band parameter.. so
the correct line is..

tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 4 priomap 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 1
1 1 1 2 2 2 2

> Hi there
> This is ver infornmative
> I've long wanted priority of some protocol over the other.
> Now my question is:
> Can i use this with htb?
>
> I want:
> o ip 172.16.0.5 bandwidth restriction of 32 kbps (htb ceil)
> o ip 172.16.0.49 bandwidth restriction of 64 kbps (htb ceil)
> o protocol 23 priority over protocol 80
>
> U see, I don't want to limit "protocol 80" to some bandwidth
> restriction so that "protocol 23" gets the rest available
bandwidth
> I just want "proto 23" packets priority over "proto 80"
>
> In the above example u used the "prio" qdisc
> Can i use this with my htb as the roo qdisc and prio
> lower down in the class?
>

Yes, this should work out well. I suggest you add prio qdisc to the leafs in
your htb class-tree.

> Thanx
>

no problem

On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 01:02:03PM +0200, Soulfly wrote:
> > "Soulfly" <zob_soulfly@hotmail.com> thus wrote:
> >
> > > tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 5 priomap 2 3 2 2
3 3 3
> 3 1
> > > 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
> > > tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 10
> > > tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 20: sfq perturb 10
> > > tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:3 handle 30: sfq perturb 10
> > > tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:4 handle 40: sfq perturb 10
> > > tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1: prio 10 u32 match ip
> protocol
> > > 0xXX 0xff flowid 1:1
> >
>
> I have a configuration which use 5 prio levels (2 above the standard
> priolevels). I conerted it to 4 and forgot to alter the band parameter.. so
> the correct line is..
>
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 4 priomap 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 1
> 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
>

Here is my net config:



LAN1->(eth1)ipsec_gw1(ppp0)---------------(ppp0)ipsec_gw2(eth1)<-LAN2
                                                    ^
						    |
						 server

Ok, so I tried this:

tc qdisc del dev ppp0 root
tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: prio
tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 10
tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:2 handle 20: sfq perturb 10
tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:3 handle 30: sfq perturb 10
tc filter add dev ppp0 protocol ip parent 1: prio 10 u32 match ip
protocol 0x50 0xff flowid 1:1


I did it on my too ipsec-end gateway


so if from I connect from LAN1 to LAN2 via ssh, all traffic go in 10:,
and when I ftp from LAN1 to the server directly through internet (no
tunnel), traffic go in 30:


But this doesn't change anything, ssh is as slow as without prio when I
do ftp????

Where is my probably qos conception error??

Thanks for any help.

--
Easter-eggs                                Spécialiste GNU/Linux
44-46 rue de l'Ouest  -  75014 Paris   -   France -  Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37    -     Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76
mailto:elacour@easter-eggs.com   -    http://www.easter-eggs.com