Dear camping users,

having been contacted by Julian Tarkhanov, I am willing to prepare the
next camping release. _why has given me his friendly approval, with
the reserve that camping.rb should be lower than 4k. He also told me
that he wanted to remove the ActiveSupport and Markaby dependencies.

I am writing here to get the users input so that I don't do any
mistake. So far, my plans are to :
- solve all remaining bugs in the tracker
- remove the unused #errors_for method. Please give some input if you do !
- add some unit-tests.

This will result in a short-term release with not too much changes,
used for code stabilization.

When this is done, I will embark on 2.0 for bigger changes like
Markaby and AR removal.

Cheers,
  zimbatm

> This will result in a short-term release with not too much changes,
> used for code stabilization.
>
> When this is done, I will embark on 2.0 for bigger changes like
> Markaby and AR removal.

Cool, I'm currently trying to get my apps working with svn camping. I
think I've found a problem surrounding URL(). Jonas, can you try to
float around #camping to discuss any problems?

Manfred

it would be really cool do remove the apache scriptAlias directive so
camping would run everywhere

On 9/23/07, Manfred Stienstra <manfred at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This will result in a short-term release with not too much changes,
> > used for code stabilization.
> >
> > When this is done, I will embark on 2.0 for bigger changes like
> > Markaby and AR removal.
>
> Cool, I'm currently trying to get my apps working with svn camping. I
> think I've found a problem surrounding URL(). Jonas, can you try to
> float around #camping to discuss any problems?
>
> Manfred
> _______________________________________________
> Camping-list mailing list
> Camping-list at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
>



--
Andr? G. Cardozo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/camping-list/attachments/20070923/de64dcb4/att...

2007/9/24, andr? gustavo cardozo <walkandre at gmail.com>:
> it would be really cool do remove the apache scriptAlias directive so
> camping would run everywhere

Sure, could you file a bug for this ?

--
Cheers,
  zimbatm

Remove Markaby? How will that work?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/camping-list/attachments/20070924/b0bb582a/att...

2007/9/25, Michael Maltese <archengule at gmail.com>:
> Remove Markaby? How will that work?

Only as a direct dependency. It will probably kept as an extension.
Basically, you can return a string containing html from your
controller methods even if it's a bit rough.

--
Cheers,
  zimbatm

That makes sense.
An extension, do you mean like camping/session?

On 9/24/07, Jonas Pfenniger <zimbatm at oree.ch> wrote:
>
> 2007/9/25, Michael Maltese <archengule at gmail.com>:
> > Remove Markaby? How will that work?
>
> Only as a direct dependency. It will probably kept as an extension.
> Basically, you can return a string containing html from your
> controller methods even if it's a bit rough.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>   zimbatm
> _______________________________________________
> Camping-list mailing list
> Camping-list at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/camping-list/attachments/20070924/24d68aba/att...

2007/9/25, Michael Maltese <archengule at gmail.com>:
> That makes sense.
> An extension, do you mean like camping/session?

Yes, and the gem dependency would only be added to camping-omnibus.
But first, let's release Camping 1.6

--
Cheers,
  zimbatm

Hi all,

I was looking at the test cases on the changeset:

http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/camping/browser/trunk/test?rev=227

However, I didn't see anything about testing with different web
browsers; which is a concern since there was a nasty WEBrick bug in
the last version.  Is there test coverage for that?

-- Ernie P.

P.S. I mean to file the bug, but got into a fight with the trac
system. ;-(

2007/9/27, Ernest Prabhakar <ernest.prabhakar at gmail.com>:
> I was looking at the test cases on the changeset:
>
> http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/camping/browser/trunk/test?rev=227
>
> However, I didn't see anything about testing with different web
> browsers; which is a concern since there was a nasty WEBrick bug in
> the last version.  Is there test coverage for that?

Hi Ernie,

I didn't get into testing the various web servers yet. Ref 277 is the
base to do that, since those apps can be tested against the various
web servers. I know there are some issues with FastCGI too so I'll
have to get into it anyways.

> P.S. I mean to file the bug, but got into a fight with the trac
> system. ;-(

You need a http://rubyforge.org/ account, which you can then reuse
here : http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/access/
Once you are registered, you can log into the various Trac
applications. File upload doesn't work tough.

Anyways, you can still describe your bug on the list and I'll see what to do.

--
Cheers,
  zimbatm

On Sep 27, 2007, at 10:44, Jonas Pfenniger wrote:

>> P.S. I mean to file the bug, but got into a fight with the trac
>> system. ;-(

Patch uploads seem to be broken, so maybe _why can have a look-see?

Manfred

Hi Jonas,

On Sep 27, 2007, at 1:44 AM, Jonas Pfenniger wrote:
> I didn't get into testing the various web servers yet. Ref 277 is the
> base to do that, since those apps can be tested against the various
> web servers. I know there are some issues with FastCGI too so I'll
> have to get into it anyways.

Thanks.  The problem was a typo in webrick.rb, but it looks like it
is fixed in trunk, so I won't worry about it.

If I run into other issues, I'll be sure to fix them.

Best,
-- Ernie P.

>

2007/9/23, Manfred Stienstra <manfred at gmail.com>:
> > This will result in a short-term release with not too much changes,
> > used for code stabilization.
> >
> > When this is done, I will embark on 2.0 for bigger changes like
> > Markaby and AR removal.
>
> Cool, I'm currently trying to get my apps working with svn camping. I
> think I've found a problem surrounding URL(). Jonas, can you try to
> float around #camping to discuss any problems?

I am not really an IRC user but I will try to.

I'd really appreciate if every concerned person could follow the
changesets and raise objection on the list. It is easy to follow if
you use rss feeds :
http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/camping/timeline?milestone=on&ticket=on&...

--
Cheers,
  zimbatm