| Friday November 30 2007 | ||
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 11:17AM | 1 | backgroundrb not cleaning up tmp files? |
| 10:57AM | 2 | which version of backgroundrb to use |
| Wednesday November 21 2007 | ||
| Time | Replies | Subject |
| 12:06AM | 2 | Is fork { } safe inside of a worker? How else may this be done... |
| Friday November 16 2007 | ||
| Time | Replies | Subject |
| 12:46PM | 1 | Backgroundrb with Load Balancing Rails engines |
| Wednesday November 14 2007 | ||
| Time | Replies | Subject |
| 11:11PM | 1 | couple of questions |
| 2:40PM | 0 | Worker status bug in new version |
| 5:01AM | 7 | BackgrounDRb version 1.0RC1 available now |
| Monday November 12 2007 | ||
| Time | Replies | Subject |
| 8:31PM | 1 | Worker start lag |
| 4:05PM | 0 | Workers calling Workers |
| Friday November 9 2007 | ||
| Time | Replies | Subject |
| 8:07PM | 1 | Why the switch to SMTP |
| 4:05PM | 1 | Why the switch to SMTP |
| 3:08PM | 2 | Backgroundrb alternative idea |
| Wednesday November 7 2007 | ||
| Time | Replies | Subject |
| 5:51PM | 2 | workers cleanup |
| Friday November 2 2007 | ||
| Time | Replies | Subject |
| 10:05AM | 10 | pre-release version of backgroundrb available now from svn |
threads ≈ 736
replies ≈ 1308